Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Reading or seeing news is a part of human lives. Many people read a newspaper or watch news programs on the television, some of them watch or read the news that is written or presented by those who have a similar view. On the other hand, some people are very interested to watch or read the news at the opposite of their views. Personally speaking, I think the significant point in reading or watching news is that getting them by people whose views are different from ours. After all, I agree with the proposed statement in the question. I have mentioned some points and examples of my experience in this case.
First, I think one of the purposes of seeing or reading news is to know about events in our country or all over the world. If our goal is that we want to increase our knowledge about those events, so we must see both sides of the news because until we do not know about all sides of the news, we can not get a result, and our little knowledge is lacking. For example, I have a friend in my university that she always follow news on the television programs or newspaper, but she just pays attention to the view that is the same with her. As I have seen, she has not an open mind about events, and can not make the right belief about them. Someday, she told me about how a senator has decided to decrease air pollution. I do not follow news or politic, but when I heard her, I realized that the decision the senator had made will not work at all, after that it was determined that I was right.
To sum up, we must raise our understanding well and notice views that are different from our opinion because just in this way we can claim to know something and choose the right direction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | redark777 | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | janfaisal | 73 | view |
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The 3
- In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. The "let it burn" policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues because in fossils the animals living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals Thus scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70 million ye 3
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples to supp 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, well, after all, for example, i think, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.28660436137 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32410863857 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507788161994 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3565916265 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.846153846 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288222679377 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110354696414 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11013915478 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189493913819 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15388649253 0.0645574589148 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 58.1214874552 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.9 10.9000537634 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 86.8835125448 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.