Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
News is one of the most efficient ways to be informed regarding what is going globally. In this connection, there some various viewpoints, two of which are more controversial in which it is more sensible whether to watch the news which is presented by social members who have opposed the idea from us are ones who are on the same page with us. Personally, it is my firm conviction that the first idea offers more benefits. Stating in the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my standpoint through two conspicuous reasons.
The first worthwhile mentioning reason to lend credence to my stance is that reading news from newspapers that present different news is the best practical way not to be biased. To put it in the other words, acquiring news from a single source that is thinking as we cause us to decide unobjectively. Actually, all sources of news are supporting by political pantries since they need their support otherwise, they will not survive. As a result, they do not broadcast news that harms their popularity in which following them makes sus more shortsighted people who will be absolutely biased. So, it can be inferred vividly that how watching the news from different sources helps us with our decision to make unbiased.
The second noteworthy point to endorse my outlook is that watching the news from channels that hold different vie towards issues makes us more open-minded in which enhance our resiliency regarding bearing different ideology. As a matter of fact, the more we are familiar with different ideas, the more are we able to go along with them. Different people believe in different ideas which at first sight may be against us while in deeper attention it will be cleared out that their goal is the same as our goal. Therefore, when people watch and read news from a wide variety including those are on the different page opens more doors for us to see the world from.
To wrap up what has been discussed, I profoundly believe that news from sources that hold different views from ours has more edges. This is because they not only prevent us from making decisions biasedly but also help us with having more resilience about different ideas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | redark777 | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | janfaisal | 73 | view |
- Historians military strategists political scientists and economists are all greatly interested in the mechanisms that led to the rise of the roman empire the roman empire known for sustained military and political domination of many areas of europe north 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement young people in the past were dependent on their parents to make their own decisions too much but these days young people make their decisions for their life lonely 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends 60
- In recent years wind energy as a source of renewable and clear energy has become increasingly popular Unfortunately wind energy has one significant environmental drawback fast moving turbine blades pose serious threats to birds flying through wind farms V 81
- State whether you agree or disagree with the following statement Then explain your reasons using specific details in your explanation Some people prefer to go to the movie theatre others prefer to rent a movie which do you think is better and why Include 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, look, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, while, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61695803049 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.4330342177 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254763863538 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946768921446 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621144589106 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166717331732 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374862827182 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.