Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your
old friends than it is to make new friends
Friend and friendship carry many meanings with themselves, such as love, help and mental support. Confrontation of new and old, especially about friends, seems controversial from ancient times until the modern era. From my perspective, keeping old friends and trying to find new ones is the best choice. Nevertheless, according to the question, keeping old friends could be more beneficial for two main reasons:
Firstly, old friends know themselves like the palm of their hands; indeed, it is crucial because they know how to treat each other, answer each other's needs, and finally, how to back each other. These items are vital for genuine friendship. For instance, when I failed the konkur exam, I became depressed and anxious because I did not know what I should do for my future. Besides, I had tried hard for that exam, and I did not succeed. However, my close friend arranged a memorable trip to turkey and surprised me with that. As a result, my mental scars healed well. The critical point of this example was the trip; because I was crazy about traveling, and my friend knew that well.
Secondly, trust is an essential factor in every relationship, and it will not be built unless in the course of time. Furthermore, old friends can gain advancement by means of trust; since they can talk about their problems and secrets to each other simply without any worry. New researches have shown that friends who know each other for more than five years are more honest with each other than those who are fresh to each other. Besides, those who have long-term friendships are at a lower risk of different kinds of mental disorders such as depression, anxiety and schizophrenia; because they have someone to talk to and interact with comfortably.
In conclusion, according to the mentioned reasons, I believe that long-standing friendships are more precious than recent ones for two reasons. First, they know each other quite enough to figure out how to treat each other under any circumstances, and second, their relationship has an important factor named trust, which has been built over a long period of time. As a result, I suggest that keeping your old friends and making an effort to find new good ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | fmichela | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
- what are the qualities of a good university develop your position using illustrations and reasons 60
- A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 60
- birds and buildings 66
- The reading provides some critics against buzzing advertising which is a tactic that does not let other people know the buzzer is hired to advertise However the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all First the a 70
- internet and children 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...trust, which has been built over a long period of time. As a result, I suggest that keeping yo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91466666667 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63276584603 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7441302128 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.411764706 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0588235294 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248989708562 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799961380429 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806201426364 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16781034543 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630427140652 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.