Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In the modern world, both Internet access and public transportation possess substantial benefits to humans. Thus, it’s always worthwhile to invest money in these categories. However, personally, I still believe that Internet access should be put on a higher priority.
First, advanced Internet access benefits students. Instead of spending time travelling to traditional classes, nowadays students can do it online, which is basically more efficient. Furthermore, the Internet can aid students in searching for studying materials. Since information and details are now uploaded on many foundations, students by clicking a few buttons are able to obtain them easily. For example, I used to go to the library for documents whenever I had assignments and the process of claiming the appropriate material was burdensome as there were so many books that I had to contemplate. However, with the Internet, I could go online and ask people in the forums related to my subject. Not only did those people offer me interesting books, they also shared tips and offered explicit explanations. Ultimately, this aided me a lot with my paper and I think that if governments invested in Internet access, students would be able to improve in their academic career since they can acquire perspectives from various individuals.
Second, Internet access helps create and maintain businesses. Since the Internet provides communications between people, sellers can have their stores based online and market their products to the customers, which creates many opportunities for earnings. In addition, old businesses, specifically ones who had their shops shut down due to the pandemic, can use the Internet to keep contact with their clients so that they will not lose their incomes. Similarly, clients can use devices like phones or laptops to access the Internet to purchase goods. These merits contribute to the survival of the country’s economy when people are forced to stay home. On the other hand, enhancing public transportation during this crisis is futile since everybody is conforming to social distancing, hence fewer people to commute by bus or subways. Therefore, investing in public transportation will not benefit the people and instead drain the budget of the governments, which are supposed to cure people and fight the pandemic.
In conclusion, developing Internet access enables students to obtain more knowledge and help them to achieve better academic performances as well as sustaining the economy of the country, while improvement in public transportation does not bring any significant benefits.
- Some students prefer to study alone Others prefer to study with a group of students Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- Why are u here 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 97
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by email they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss should be put on a higher priority. First, advanced Internet access benefits...
^^^
Line 5, column 818, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ancing, hence fewer people to commute by bus or subways. Therefore, investing in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, similarly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48635235732 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98366228641 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598014888337 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7510701204 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.368421053 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217258812243 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632526042552 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393741455032 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134669550206 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126683699676 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.