Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
From a general point of view, news have always been a credible source of awareness of the surrounding events. In this regard, which type of news can be more fruitful and informant is among the most controversial subjects which often provokes discussions. Some people keep endorsing the claim that reading news by people possessing the similar perspective as yours yields better results whereas others dismiss this. Personally, It is my firm conviction that reading news presented by people with the opposite opinion is better. In what follows, I aptly elucidate what rationale my perspective is based on.
To commerce, paying attention to news reported by people with the opposite point of view helps us coming to a different conclusion than what we might have. To put in a vivid picture, people with a different mindset and analyzing criteria will consider other facets of the matter which could be camouflaged from us. Hence, they will, definitely, illustrate more facts about that matter and change our attitude and ramifications. My own experience can serve as a compelling example. A few years ago, some news regarding the incoming inflation released by broadcasters and many analyzers try to explain it from different aspects. Suddenly, I encountered a economic specialist who was an opponent of our view and explained it in another fashion. Eventually, since he enlightened some elegant and intricated facts which was hard for us to find out, I changed my attitude toward the upcoming events by the inflation. Had it not been for the sake of trusting opposing views, my vision would not have been extended about the matter.
The second pivotal reason that bears in mind is that the critici's, or even detractors', vision can positively contributes to brushing up the critical ability of our brain. To delineate, based on the most referred scientific resources, a myriad of the brain's abilities should be worked on in order to be fostered and reach a satisfying level to be practical. This can be applied to our critical thinking as well which will be improved by being prone to many critics. For instance, when I was attending the university, we had to criticize the most renowned architectural projects as an assignment. Therefore, each of the students try to consider the projects either successful or doomed to the failure. The spots that they all mentioned, gradually, enhanced the way we should look at a project to drive out all its weaknesses and strengths. If this exercise had not been done in the freshman, I would have not been a prosperous architect capable of criticizing my designs and enhancing them before rendering.
To put it in a nutshell, keeping track of matters and news stating by the opponents provides us with many booms. This is because not only it help us seeing the hidden facets of the news and broadening our vision, but also do it help improving our critical thinking ability of our brain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | redark777 | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | janfaisal | 73 | view |
- The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- : In general, people are living longer now. Discuss the causes of this phenomenon. Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 3
- sea otter population decrease 83
- do you agree or disagree that athletes and entertainers deserve to have more privacy than what they have now. 60
- if in a speech the speaker say something wrong you will choose to interrupt him or wait until the end of the speech 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to come' or 'come'.
Suggestion: to come; come
...ith the opposite point of view helps us coming to a different conclusion than what we ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 652, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ferent aspects. Suddenly, I encountered a economic specialist who was an opponent...
^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'contribute'
Suggestion: contribute
... even detractors, vision can positively contributes to brushing up the critical ability of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...many booms. This is because not only it help us seeing the hidden facets of the news...
^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to see' or 'see'.
Suggestion: to see; see
...ms. This is because not only it help us seeing the hidden facets of the news and broad...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...d broadening our vision, but also do it help improving our critical thinking ability...
^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to improve' or 'improve'.
Suggestion: to improve; improve
...adening our vision, but also do it help improving our critical thinking ability of our br...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2440.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98977505112 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83736122558 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548057259714 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.045829684 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.909090909 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2272727273 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167474579191 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491071448557 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611964577201 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107836759997 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850983159968 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.