Nowadays, people are focused on a project based on whether concepts are more important than facts. The problem triggered a hot debate on the internet. Some people hold the opinion that understanding concepts is fundamental, others hold the opposite attitude. From my perspective, I firmly believe both concepts and facts are equally important and I will elaborate on my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.
On one hand, fully understanding a concept help people become creative. A concept is like a seed that will grow in a person's mind if the person obtains and master it. To be specific, after understanding a concept, a person is capable to utilize and interact with it and even recreate other creative thoughts with their own personal characteristics. To illustrate, Quentin Tarantino is a brilliant movie director and screenwriter who is famous for using old film elements that he had watched and collected and reinforced in his own project, as a result, Quentin Tarantino established a unique genre. Therefore, understanding concepts play a critical role and are beneficial.
On the other hand, facts can determine whether the concepts are effective and persuasive. In order to navigate whether a concept is functional or not, facts can not only provide a clear path that demonstrates the direction is correct but also make the detail and prevent making similar mistakes previous had made before. For instance, a mature design needs to go through multiple sequences and experient in order to produce the final consequence. Brainstorming for a concept is usually an initial step, after the sequence, consider the realistic and practical aspects and elements due to the facts that we have learned and understood are significantly important and useful in the process. Thus, facts bring a positive impact on ower lives.
From what has been discussed above, we can safely draw a conclusion that both concepts and facts are advantageous to us.
- TPO49 Humpback whales 70
- TPO50 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO47 Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs we 70
- TPO47 IndependentDo you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO42 Integrated Writing 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22929936306 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01405150435 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595541401274 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9756877609 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.466666667 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254842540478 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753638106774 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424237777892 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13360726126 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447838361413 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.