Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, people can easily access news presented by different people through the internet and social media. While some people argue that it is better to read or watch news made by people whose opinions are similar to theirs, I am of the opinion that people should accept different news and perspectives from people whose views are different from theirs.
Accepting news presented from different perspectives is a good way to step out of one's comfort zone. People who only choose to read or watch news and articles with the same opinion will feel comfortable when they see the news agreeing with them. However, they can just stay in their comfort zone and cannot realize the fact. For example, I only received the news which has the same view as me and I thought that everyone in the world has a similar perspective to me. Thus, when I read an article with the opposite view from me, I was shocked. Since I could not imagine that there were many different kinds of views. Finally, I realized that I was staying in my comfort zone without accepting different points of view. Therefore, reading and watching news presented by people whose views are different from my own helped me to step out of my comfort zone.
People can learn more from the news that is made from different opinions. There are a thousand Hamlets in a thousand people's eyes. Everyone has their own view on a single event, and it is important to accept a variety of views. By doing so, people can gain information more comprehensive and can learn from other views that we do not even think about. Take my personal experience for example. I saw a governmental policy and I thought it was ridiculous. Every piece of news I read agreed with my point. However, when I share my opinion with my friend, he pointed out that there were several benefits that I did not realize. Thus, I learned more about the policy from my friend, and it made me think deeper.
What can be concluded from the aforementioned reasons is that compared to accepting news which is in the same view, it is more crucial to accept different opinions from it because it helps people to step out of their comfort zone and can learn more from different points of view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | redark777 | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | janfaisal | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own Use specif 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples to supp 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...rspectives is a good way to step out of ones comfort zone. People who only choose to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e opposite view from me, I was shocked. Since I could not imagine that there were man...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...nce I could not imagine that there were many different kinds of views. Finally, I realized tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63520408163 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44517002805 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436224489796 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2488607485 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.85 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376953529018 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121357505632 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10158561946 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255526967435 0.150856017488 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687018428837 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...rspectives is a good way to step out of ones comfort zone. People who only choose to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e opposite view from me, I was shocked. Since I could not imagine that there were man...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...nce I could not imagine that there were many different kinds of views. Finally, I realized tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63520408163 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44517002805 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436224489796 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2488607485 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.85 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376953529018 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121357505632 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10158561946 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255526967435 0.150856017488 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687018428837 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.