Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to
make friends with people who can have fun with us than to make friends with people who can
help us when we are in need.
Friends, in some ways, determine what kind of life we live and thus we choose them carefully.
Since friends have different types, people naturally try to distinguish good ones from the bad.
Some people claim that it offers more advantages to make friends with people who can have fun
with them than with people who can help them when they are in need. However, my attitude is
just the opposite of such statement. I believe that no one is more important and valuable than
those who can help.
Making friends with people who can have fun with us is not always necessary or beneficial.
Having fun is indeed an indispensable part of life, yet we do not always need friends to do so.
When the timing is right, we can have fun with anyone without making friends with them. It is
just like that we dance with strangers on a square when celebrating the national day, or that we
have an interesting chat with the driver while taking a taxi. Such things happen frequently, but
these people do not necessarily become our friends. What is more, even if such people become
our friends, they would not act as important ones if the only thing we do together is having fun.
Staying with fun friends too much can easily distract our attention from things that we are
supposed to focus on, which means a waste of time and letting opportunities slip. People with so
many tasks to deal with every day seldom need or think of their fun friends.
On the contrary, friends who can help us when we are in need not only benefit our life but even
change it in an unexpected positive way. Getting support from others always brings us a sense of
security and makes us feel safe no matter what difficulty we encounter. Making friends with such
people means comfort, protection, and sometimes, even privileges. That is why many of us
consider making some local friends the most urgent mission that we need to accomplish after
moving to a new city or a new country. In addition, some people not only help us when we ask
for assistance but even remind us of what we need or lack without being required to. These
people can be our saviors as well as mentors, for they can even prevent us from being too proud
of ourselves and making terrible mistakes. To me, my parents are such kind of friends and they
give me advice even if they know that I may not like it. Thanks to them, I have achieved
accomplishments better than most people expected.
Friends might be the most influential people in our lives. They are like teachers, supporters and
reminders. Although we can also have fun with them, we still know quite clearly that this is not
why we value them so much.
- Do you agree or disagree this statement: To solve the problems of present and the future, people should review the past. 60
- It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or spaceexploration. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important tomake friends with people who can have fun with us than to make friends with people who canhelp us when we are in need. 70
- The food people ate in the past was healthier than the food people eat today 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, in addition, kind of, as well as, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2228.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.622406639 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36700080082 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47510373444 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4197032784 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.12 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.28 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 29.0 4.53405017921 640% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.562503872993 0.236089414692 238% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171360025619 0.076458572812 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148941623275 0.0737576698707 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165929170069 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133175464182 0.0645574589148 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.