Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more interesting to read a good book or see a good movie the second time than the first time.
There is no shortage of opinion on whether watching movies and reading the book for second time is good or waste of time. Some people argue that nothing more can be achieved from repeating same movie or book. However, for me, I find reading a good movie or seeing a good movie the second time more interesting.
First of all, simply the idea of watching or reading something good gratifies my inner soul. Selecting a good book and movies is a cumbersome process. So, personally when I have urge to use my leisure or when I am feeling down, I opt to watch my favorite movie for one more time. In doing so, I don't have to go through a long procedure of filtering out movies and even after starting the movies I am satisfied with the thought that I am spending my time to enjoy something good. Furthermore, I am also certain that I will be replenished at the end of the movie. I find this thought very satisfying.
Secondly, when we reread a good movie or rewatch a good movie, there is an opportunity to delve deeper in the gist and content. With this, a better understanding of characters and plot can be gained. Furthermore, the whole process of realizing the missed ideas of the book or the movie during reread or rewatch is a fascinating experience. Drawing from my personal experience, I was more interested with the world of Harry Potter when I reread the book "Harry Potter and The Philosopher Stone" for the second time. I realized how I have missed some of the major events and the actual idea that the characters are trying to portray. This satisfaction can only be obtained in rereading and rewatching.
To sum up, I definitely think investing time to reread a good book or rewatch a good film is an interesting experience that contributes to more comprehension of the subject matter and fills us with good vibes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-04 | Sujan Shrestha | 60 | view |
- The shrimping industry relies on trawls for its harvest Trawls are huge nets that are dragged behind boats in order to catch shrimp Other animals like sea turtles are often caught inside these nets and soon die without sufficient oxygen To help reduce the 60
- Eco certified Wood Products 83
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms offices and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students More and more however they also appear as guests on television news programs giving expert commentary on the latest events in the w 80
- Alternative energy is any way of creating power for humankind to use other than the burning of fossil fuels which is harmful to the environment Some examples include solar panels which derive usable energy from the Sun s rays and wind turbines which colle 80
- Eco Ceritified Wood 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...movie for one more time. In doing so, I dont have to go through a long procedure of ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cond time. I realized how I have missed some of the major events and the actual idea that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60365853659 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7662706164 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493902439024 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6503789811 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.375 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410650561288 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135897760253 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126291547372 0.0737576698707 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280695150136 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982576981423 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.