Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Migration and Relocation are the most important pillars for each society in today's world. These concepts have been for several years and people faced them several in their lives. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether moving to a new town is not a good thing for people because they lose their friends. Some people possess the conviction that this opinion is agreeable whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that this point has less chance. I am personally content that this issue is multifaceted. Due to the fact, we live in a chaotic and fast-paced world, we always looking for great opportunities to improve our lives' quality. However, I'd rather continue with the second approach. To substantiate, my point of view the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is that when we move to a new country we can find native or immigrant people who are humble and helps us to overcome the challenges of living in new places. In particular, they enjoy helping other people. Meanwhile, we don't need to lose our old friends. Consider my personal experience to make this point more clear. One of my friends moved abroad to study and work. When he left our country I was so upset and thought I never see him again. He had difficulties at first when he arrived, but he could find kind native people who helped him in his journey. Last year, I went and saw him. It did not change anything between us. We still friend with each other.
The second rationale reason behind the opinion is rooted in the fact that moving to a new town can help people to have income and they can send some of their money to their old friends. Consequently, they do not feel lost their old friend, instead, they help them financially. For example, if they see their friends need some medician bits of help or money, they help them.
In brief, due to the aforementioned reasons, I disagree with the statement that moving to a new country is not a good thing for people because they lose their old friends.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-09 | zahrazara | 70 | view |
2023-03-04 | ArashAlirezaei | 66 | view |
2023-03-04 | ArashAlirezaei | 70 | view |
2023-03-04 | ArashAlirezaei | 70 | view |
2022-12-17 | shekoo20 | 63 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement People will spend less time cooking and preparing food in twenty years 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 82
- Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before Give specific examples and details to support your answer 76
- TPO 50 integrated writing
- TPO 52 The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 692, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
... to improve our lives quality. However, Id rather continue with the second approac...
^^
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...joy helping other people. Meanwhile, we dont need to lose our old friends. Consider ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, still, whereas, while, for example, in brief, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70967741935 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55323141034 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545698924731 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.5254759125 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6363636364 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77272727273 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333760160983 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882508386358 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113238674086 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250638597413 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127558356878 0.0645574589148 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.