Space travel and space exploration are not a myth anymore. It is not uncommon that many countries start developing their space travel technology. However, some people criticize the high cost of spending money on space travel or exploration. From my perspective, governments spending money to fund space expeditions has positive impacts on society.
To begin with, powerful space travel technologies can equip the country with high competency in global affairs, which would potentially increase its reputation in the competition between different countries. Space travel technologies represent the top level of a country's synthesized ability. The country that has these technologies has a great advantage in negotiating with other countries such as the sharing of information and the collaboration and cooperation in specific topics related to space explorations. Also, it will also bring the country the right to bargain in a diplomatic situation. For example, the Chinese government with the technology of landing on the moon can have the right to express their opinion on the global stage in discussing spatial justice and regulations collectively with other counties that also has advanced technologies. Therefore, investing money in space travel can improve the speaking of a county.
In addition to the advantage in global affairs, promoting space travel can also be beneficial to a country's own development of scientific research. Since space travel and space exploration need many high-tech devices and experiments as well as outstanding scientists and researchers from all fields to collaborate together to come over difficulties. During the process, the government not only needs to strengthen the productivity of space research but also the educational system in the university since the students there are the quasi-engineers and quasi-scientists in the future. And not to mention the equipment and scientific facilities that the university might get from the funding of the government, which can also benefit other related disciplinary such as computer science, artificial intelligence, etc. All science will have a great leap forward because of the investment in space.
Admittedly, many people might think that if the government spends money on space travel, there will be less investment in other public issues. But actually, with the advent of technology and the improvement of life quality, a rich economy nowadays can afford the high cost of space travel, as well as space research, which not competes with the money, invests in the development of other public expenditures such as public welfare, public transportations, education, etc. More importantly, space exploration might discover other habitats that are also suitable for human beings in the future or discover a novel fuel that exists on other planets, which will create a significant impact on the earth to relieve our burden of fuel shortage, ecological problems, overpopulations, etc. Thus, it guarantees a bright future that benefits all of us.
To sum up, based on the positive impacts on global reputation, improvement of domestic research, and increasing the chance of surviving in the future, it is worth funding space travel and exploration.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students who keep their rooms neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than students who do not 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Physical exercise is more important to older people than to young people 90
- Are government doing good in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 804, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rpopulations, etc. Thus, it guarantees a bright future that benefits all of us. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, speaking of, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2745.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53427419355 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13731379857 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485887096774 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 858.6 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.9060311437 48.9658058833 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.25 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274810100695 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105297310319 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631213002985 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176572937485 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625676222424 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 86.8835125448 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.