Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
There are many countries to study space, and the field is very costed to research. Therefore, the government currently started investing in it. Should the government capitalize on it? Some people think that governments should fund space exploration. However, it is not helpful for the governments to fund space travel or space exploration because the governments don’t have enough money to support space exploration financially, and researchers are already supported by the researchers’ companies.
First of all, governments do not have sufficient money to invest in the space fields. What this means is that the revenue of governments generally comes from the people’s taxes, so they should prioritize where to spend the money wisely. There are important issues such as health and education that need more government funding. The most important factor to operate the government is people. Then, in the health sector, when people get an illness, which is a serious problem for society such as an epidemic, it will be fatal for the operation of the governments. For example, many historians argue that one of the most impacting factors to cause a lot of past countries to fall. Also, in the case of education, this is a source of technological advancement. Therefore, if people are not instructed, especially higher-education such as university or college, the government would not exploit future technology. However, people have to pay a lot of money for getting the higher-education, which means that it is necessary for governments to back them financially. This clearly shows that the government should not support space exploration due to the lack of money.
Second, governments are not responsible for supporting scientific research such as space travel and space equipment. This is because other places such as universities and private companies recognize that one of the most impacted future industry is the space industry. To be specific, scientific research is already well supported by organizations. Thus, governments don’t need to be an additional supporter especially if it has no practical use. Let me bring up my personal story as an example. I am currently working as an engineer at a large corporation in Korea. My job is to come up with innovative ideas and create equipment for space exploration. Most of my ideas and sample engines for going to space more efficiently will never be used, but I continue to research because I’m getting paid for it by the company which is a space company. Once they decide on equipment and start using the items when they fire their rocket to space. Hence, there is absolutely no need for extra funding from the government for my research.
In conclusion, what governments support space travel or space exploration is a waste of money. Governments have to focus on other important things such as health and education. This is because they are the most crucial factors in countries. Scientists already have gotten funding from companies because companies and universities foresee the future industry such as space travel.
- In times of an economic crisis in which area should governments reduce its spending Arts Scientific research parks and public gardens 73
- It is better to make friends who are intelligent than with a good sense of humor 76
- Nowadays students do many things like surfing the internet listening to music when they are learning Do you agree or disagree that doing other things has s bad effect on learning 73
- People spend too much money on their pets even though there can be other good ways to spend money Give details and examples to support your response 70
- It is more important for teachers to connect with students than to be experts in their fields 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upported by the researchers’ companies. First of all, governments do not have su...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... exploration due to the lack of money. Second, governments are not responsible ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g from the government for my research. In conclusion, what governments support ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2598.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23790322581 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02882441143 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459677419355 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 811.8 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6818869919 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5862068966 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1034482759 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41379310345 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326103083637 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100164470617 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105126137886 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242655999648 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536830465161 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.