Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
It is beyond dispute that all aspect of sience deserves respect. Sine the dawn of the humanity, people have been curious about the the life beyond the earth. They postulated numerous hypothesis about it; therefore, there have been heating debate among perspectives. With all respect that I have to astronomy, I believe that governments should not allocate huge amount of money to fund space exploration. In the following paragraphs I will elucidate my most convincing reasons.
First and foremost, without shadow of doubs, we have more pivotal issues to concern about, like fossil fuels. As we are aaware, our beloved earth is running out of fossil fuels, as soon as it is possible, it should be replaced by renewable energies like, solar, geothermal,wind, to name but handful. Moreover, they have the most negetive impact on global warming ensuing from air pollution. Fossil fuels not only change ecosystem, but also is conducive to many diseas like respiratory diseas or cancer. Although we have had broad spectrum of investigation about clean energies, hardly have they exercised in real conditions. So I believe that instead of funding some outerspace researches that do not have any repercaushin on such crucial delemmas, It is better to take propper measures to tackle the earth’s problems.
Having discussed the issue from previous points of veiw, I want to focus on the subject from another facet. However, we can witness progressive and monumental achievment in space engineering, like in the field of material engineering, these attainments are not tangible and advantegous to most of the people in the world. In other words, these achievments are not practical in nowadays world. For instance, the last time I checked the youtube, I read a news about new commet that is found far away from our solar system. Not only do I consider it as news, but also I am pretty sure that it has the less impact on our preeminent problems with which we are facing in our planet.
All in all, I do not deny the importance of the space rearches, but with all respect, I am on the opinion that we have periority and superiority in our world which require strict attempts to tackle the problems. Besides, the people who become aware of monumental achievments about space exploration do not consider it as important as our pivotal problems in the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-15 | hamiddelbari | 90 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | negar.sh | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | aliasghar | 76 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | persepolistmm | 70 | view |
| 2018-10-22 | SHAHRIYAR | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- For schools, assessing teacher’s teaching efficiency is a verry important issue. But is it better for other techears to assess or let students assess teachers? 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to respect'
Suggestion: to respect
...pute that all aspect of sience deserves respect. Sine the dawn of the humanity, people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...umanity, people have been curious about the the life beyond the earth. They postulated ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...umanity, people have been curious about the the life beyond the earth. They postulated ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , wind
...newable energies like, solar, geothermal,wind, to name but handful. Moreover, they ha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 749, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y repercaushin on such crucial delemmas, It is better to take propper measures to...
^^
Line 4, column 374, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...ds, these achievments are not practical in nowadays world. For instance, the last time I ch...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 451, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...last time I checked the youtube, I read a news about new commet that is found far away...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99745547074 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80253071382 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564885496183 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7561311752 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103819764954 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324743743718 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542172661873 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717031330455 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382648193069 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.