Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern agriculture
methods damage the environment, but providing food for the growing
population around the world is more important than protecting the
environment.
As a matter of fact, people have always tried to find new ways to improve the agriculture, but sometimes they are not successful. As everybody knows, modern methods have some negative effects on lands and air. Many people believe that producers should stop these new methods and some people think otherwise. In my view, I strongly believe that surviving people is the most important thing in the world. Although new methods in agriculture has some disadvantages, many people can survive with the benefit of that.
First and foremost, undoubtedly, technology are improving during the time. Scientist are trying to find new ways to reduce harmful effects of those methods. They have significant improve during last decade. Additionally, researchers are trying to find new methods to remove the negative effects on environment. On the other hand, people are aware of these bad influence. Consequently, they are trying to support researchers and try to do not waste foods. Researchers would be able to fix all environmental issues by new technologies in the future.
In addition, people need to live with eating foods. They have to survive to fix the problem. Furthermore, every person is trying to keep the earth to provide a better place for human's life. Obviously, world is not only for the people in this century, but also is for humans in the future, but we can not skip these human's life by paying attention to the earth. People have to preserve world and human together. They should create a balance in this issue.
Last but not least, although agricultural activities have a few bad effects on the environment such as air, forests, planets and marine, these influence are not that much huge. As an illustration, farmers add some hormones to the chickens food, but these animals will destroy hormones after they do not eat them for one week. Obviously, hormones are not good for human's health, but it will be remove really quick.
To sum up, scientist and people are trying to fix agriculture methods as soon as possible. Also, technology will help them to remove bad effects of nature. These factors will fix damages and prepare a pleasant condition for both humans and nature in the world.
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 61
- Do you agree or disagree that universities should spend money on improving facilities (labs and general requirements) than hiring famous teachers? 80
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 70
- Some students prefer to have their final grades determined by numerous small assignments,whereas others prefer to have their grades determined by only a few large ones. Which one doyou prefer and why? 79
- People living in small towns or villages are more satisfied with their lives than those living in big cities. 87
Comments
Essay evaluation report
technology are improving
technology is improving
Sentence: They have significant improve during last decade.
Description: An adjective is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to significant and improve
but it will be remove really quick.
but it will be removed really quick.
flaws:
Need some contents for the importance of protecting the environment.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 20 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 369 350
No. of Characters: 1776 1500
No. of Different Words: 187 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.383 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.813 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.561 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.563 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.542 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.283 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.492 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...n the future, but we can not skip these humans life by paying attention to the earth. ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'chickens'' or 'chicken's'?
Suggestion: chickens'; chicken's
...ation, farmers add some hormones to the chickens food, but these animals will destroy ho...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, really, so, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9810298103 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67355127331 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50135501355 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0872544059 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5833333333 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0953923472723 0.236089414692 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281097319562 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301518745413 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0557899207056 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017558108637 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.