Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In modern days, parents can learn more from their children than children can learn from their parents.
Nowadays, education keeps playing a pivotal role in not only society but also families. With the development of new technologies, especially the advanced media tech products and platforms on the Internet, some people reckon that children are more proficient in these fields, meanwhile, their parents are to some extent losing their ways in this modernization process. However, as far as I’m concerned, children can learn as much as their parents can learn from their children.
On the one hand, parents own lots of valuable life experiences that can still enlighten their children. Although new technology has been influencing society, some essential social structure has not changed, and these experiences also provide some insights for their children. For example, in the 1990s, programming is not prevalent in most countries and even the masses were not aware of it. The programmer was a new career at that time, even though the job is no longer rare nowadays. If the parent was one of the first-generation programmers at that moment, his/her experience about how to learn and start new fields will definitely encourage the children when they start a new career that has not been famous or even invented. Besides, it’s also parents’ responsibility to teach their children about attitudes and values, “good” and “evil”, “right” and “wrong”, etc. Such things will have an important impact on the development of children and cannot be easily learned by children on their own without parents’ guidance.
On the other hand, we have to admit it is easier for children to get accustomed to the development of society and technology, and there are a lot of platforms and applications for them to learn some advanced knowledge of which their parents cannot have good command. Also, take programming as an example. For many parents, they did not have opportunities to familiarize themselves with the basic programming languages when they were young, and they didn’t have enough time and energy to indulge in learning the related knowledge now. Their children whose compulsory subjects include programming now may help at this moment: children can help their parents to tackle the even simplest mistakes or problems with programming. Besides, the children can also inspire their parents, offering new ideas into their conventional viewpoints and sharing news from a new perspective, which also can help parents generate creative ideas and put them into practice during working.
In a nutshell, both children and their parents can learn from each other from different perspectives and dimensions. There is no need to hold a biased view toward this issue, underestimating the advantages of any part. Thus, I believe that combing the advantages of both parents and children can generate more excellent results, helping the education and development of society become better.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern days parents can learn more from their children than children can learn from their parents 70
- Many organizations try to draw people s attention to serious problems such as climate change or poverty These organizations often use images photographs and videos to motivate people to take action against those problems Some organizations use sad images 81
- Imagine that you have been given the opportunity to advise the government of a city or region area that you are familiar with to spend more money on ONE thing to benefit the city or region Which ONE of these do you believe would be the most beneficial for 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People are happier when they give money to charity or a good cause rather than when they spend it on themselves 90
- Many organizations try to draw people s attention to serious problems such as climate change or poverty These organizations often use images photographs and videos to motivate people to take action against those problems Some organizations use sad images 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2442.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34354485777 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89078874983 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518599562363 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.030335463 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3888888889 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445626856245 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157475252252 0.076458572812 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15430738209 0.0737576698707 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325612869205 0.150856017488 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06970867812 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.