• Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The more money people have, the more they should contribute to charity.
A glance at people’s attitude toward contribution of money to charities, bring to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether wealthier people must help more or not. Although some people may think that the more money you have, the more you should give to poor people, my opinion is completely opposite, and I believe that this claim is not true at all.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea, lies in the fact that rich people have a lot of responsibilities and they have to pay for a lot more things. For example, even though a doctor makes more money, s/he has to pay for the office, nurses, secretaries and bills. s/he helps society through her/his knowledge and treat people when they are sick. After a while, he can invest his money to have a more beautiful clinic with better equipment which are necessary for his job. Therefore, we cannot anticipate wealthy people donate their money because they have more money.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that contribution to charity is not the main way to help society. For example, an entrepreneur creates a lot of job which has enormous economical advantages for a country. If a businessman just helps poor people and buy food for them, it will not diminish poverty. There is a proverb in our language which is “instead of giving fish to a person, teach him how to catch fish.” Countries whit excellent welfare, have profound economy which comes from very low unemployment rate and poverty. We can add to our list, improving education, attracting tourists, increasing of wellbeing and creating democracy. Not only is spending money for poor people wrong, but also it causes more famine. Hence, giving money to charity will not resolve all the problems a country encounter.
Admittedly, if individuals do not help enough to charities, some people will die as a consequence. As a matter of fact, food is one of the basic needs of humankind. Nobody can amend a country’s situation when its people are hungry. Nevertheless, the amount of contribution is not necessarily proportionate to individual’s income. For example, if an attorney salary is ten times more than a clerk, we cannot expect to donate ten times more.
Due to the aforementioned argument explored in the previous statements, I strongly assert that we cannot ask a millionaire to donate his money to a charity because he has more money.
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 80
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. 78
- TOPIC # 56 A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should require every graduating student to take public speaking courses Give specific examples and details to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should require every graduating student to take public speaking courses Give specific examples and details to support your answer 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: S
... office, nurses, secretaries and bills. s/he helps society through her/his knowle...
^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of jobs'.
Suggestion: a lot of jobs
...y. For example, an entrepreneur creates a lot of job which has enormous economical advantage...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93689320388 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89999995937 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558252427184 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2454141323 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.7 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334052694577 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973195510038 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820704591151 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190217428753 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876795363089 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.