Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The most important characteristic of a successful leader or politician is the ability to communicate well.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, leaders and politicians play a vital role in people's success. In this connection, several factors make leaders successful. Although contested by many that the matter of having communication abilities is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that leaders should have a speaking skill to achieve success, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, a thriving leader is a person who convinces people to obey rules by speaking persuasively. To be more specific, if people do not accept commands, it will cause chaos in groups or societies, leading to failing leaders. There are some adopted rules in which people protest against them, so a great leader should communicate effectively with people and compel them to obey. For example, last year, our mayor increased the cost of public transportation and made townsfolk angry because they could not afford it. However, the mayor spoke wonderfully and advocated his decisions by explaining the benefits of the new rule, so much so that citizens felt sorry about their aggressive behavior; otherwise, they continued their disagreements, which caused disorder in the surrounding and hurt city management.
Second, politicians are successful when they have a social exchange with the public, which needs a communication ability. To elucidate, a thrive politician have insight into people crisis, thereby finding solutions for them; by doing so, people trust him and support him significantly. According to my own experience, our president has a weekly program, which includes people's requests. By knowing people's demand, he makes efforts to solve their obstacles; hence, people admire him intensively even if he makes unwise decisions because the public trust him. If he does not communicate with people and listen to their daily challenges, people won't support him in a difficult situation.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that speaking skill is a real boon for leaders. Not only do they persuade one to become agree with them, but they also inspire trust.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-29 | archerlao | 70 | view |
| 2020-09-27 | zg1122 | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | farbdabbasi | 63 | view |
| 2016-10-15 | Yanyan Liu | 70 | view |
| 2016-09-03 | mgrajapt | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Professor should prohibit the use of devices that can connect to the internet in class 81
- TPO11 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration 76
- As a student of university that has a long break between university semesters the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break Take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to their majors of stud 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important characteristic of a successful leader or politician is the ability to communicate well 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... a communication ability. To elucidate, a thrive politician have insight into people cri...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35428571429 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90917759611 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631428571429 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6907873803 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150215663862 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055290246819 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484864920633 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965932703701 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413441160641 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.