Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is an era of meida where public has easy access to movies and televisons. Complaints arise that teenagers have indulge themselves in watching multimedia. As for me, I strongly stand for this viewpoint that movies and television have more negative effects. The detailed reasoning will be as followed.
First and foremost, multimedia is so appealing and attractive to young people that teenagers can be easily addicted to such “digital drug”, consequences of which could be hazardous and threatening. Teenagers are undergoing a crucial period during which their personalities and characters have not fully developed. If watching time are not restrited, youngsters can be drowned in this meaningless entertainment which designed purposely to draw attention from public. The phenomenon of "sofa potato" is not rare in many modern families where parents and children argue all day long about televisions. Some may even break out a fierce fight at the mere mention of no allowance for watching TV. In fact, such tragedy will not only impair physical and mental health of the youth but pose tremendous threats to the family relationship as well.
Furthermore, dangerous and porny scenes in the film and drama series could induce the young generation to mimic the seemingly cool acts of the casting. Report has it that inappropriate movie watching can be one factor resulting in imitation of crimes happening among juveniles. Take the example of my neighbour's son, who is a huge fan of criminal films. The tragedy took place when he followed the instance of one hero in his favoratie films where two gansters fought for the honor of brotherhood. Unfortunately, he was sent to hospital due to loss of blood, which was a huge cost and added to the finacial burden of the entire family. That nowadays movies have not been carefully categorized and lacking reasonable supervision and guidance can impede the value system and personality building of teenagers.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that knowlege could be absorbed via multimedia. Ironically, the information and knowledge provided in the TV programmes is sometimes misleading and fake, which will interfere with the learning. By contrast, reading is far more efficient in assiting young people in gathering information and learning useful information.
In a nutshell, given the current situation of film industry, negative influences of movies and television outweigh the positive ones.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet Mars some think 3
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet Mars some think 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'indulged'.
Suggestion: indulged
...s. Complaints arise that teenagers have indulge themselves in watching multimedia. As f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, as for, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37823834197 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00527067939 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632124352332 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8194394459 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137445034354 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377514216187 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410230442651 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857004570702 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379026870568 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.