Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
Helping to each other is a vital part of society. By growing the world and population, the demand for essential items like clothing and food increase significantly and so people should help each other to survive. Some persons believes that in the past people helped other they did not know than this modern day, while others disagree completely and have an opposite view. In my opinion, I think helping each other was more important in the past than today for two critical reasons.
First and foremost, in the past people was more honest and kind than today to help each other by giving food or clothe. In the past, individuals lived in the small villages and house and had a simple relationship while they now have changed reversely and live in large cities and house. Since they knew each other very well and understood their need, they tried to help each other in different way such as giving food. For example, when my father was eight years old, he lived at small village where contained only ten families. One year, the weather became so hot and whereby nobody could have agricultural product. However, all people shared everything like food or crops to survive in that harsh condition even they did not know each other. Therefore, they could pass that time. As you can see, in the past people helped each other more than today because they were so kind.
Second, in the past individuals helped each other even if they did not know each other since they were not competitive. In modern day, as the world and population expand, people should compete with each other seriously to progress. On the other hand, in the past persons did not have to compete to survive. For instance, when my grandmother was child, she lived at small village. All people looked like each other because they had similar house or equipment and so on. They were free from any anxiety about price and cost and living condition. Therefore, when somebody faced a problem, all individuals tried to find a solution to help them. Also, every night they invited each other to their house to share their food to help each other. This experience shows me, in the past people lived similar to each other and did not have to compete each other, so they help each other.
In conclusion, in the past people helped each other more than in modern day because they lived not only simple but also they did not have to compete to survive. In modern day, government should teach people to treat with each other kindly.
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 70
- Visiting museums is the best way to learn a country 66
- tpo41 - writing1drug delivery 3
- It is difficult for teachers to be both popular well liked and the effective in helping students to learn 70
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often viewed as a bad quality for a person to have but in fact it is a good quality for a person to have 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'believe'.
Suggestion: believe
...elp each other to survive. Some persons believes that in the past people helped other th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68421052632 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2114855005 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446224256293 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7144985318 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17391304348 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256274251904 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104985836971 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696868466057 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211353369307 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315258766646 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.