Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y

In the past few decades, with the growing population, the world has been facing many serious issues, and one of them is poverty. Meanwhile, people’s attitude towards helping others have also changed. Some people think people are more likely to help others in current days compared to past times. Whereas others hold a different opinion that in earlier days, people used to be humble and helpful to others. From my perspective, the former view carries more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that technology has played a crucial role in terms of helping poor people. To be more specific, technology has come up with new different devices, whereby people could realize a real scenario around the world, and the reality touches people’s hearts. As a matter of fact, various sources of technological tools would help the community to create awareness about the current issues which was not possible in earlier days. To shed light on this, a decade before, it was hard for people to access the technology. However, in today’s scenario, people have many social media options like Facebook, news media channels, and Instagram and these platforms would broadcast about surrounding issues, and people are more likely to help others in terms of food and clothes. In this regard, there are some social media firms who run charities and NGO’s, and people would like to donate their personal belongings through them to help a lower community. Hence, nowadays, in whatever ways, people are ready to help others.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is that needless to say that, people’s lifestyle has changed nowadays, and they earn more than to past time. As a result, having a prosperous and steady life, people tend to save more in their life which could be used for poor families. Take my own personal experience as an example of this. Since I am very passionate about wearing new design clothes, sometimes, I spend a lot of money unnecessarily on buying clothes. Although when I am tired of old clothes, instead of disposing of them, I donate them to needy people. On the contrary, talking about my grandparents, it was difficult for them to fulfill such high demand when they were my age due to earning a low income. Therefore, it was not possible for the old generations to donate money in such ways.
Lastly, having discussed the issue from this point of view, I rather look at it from another standpoint. Admittedly, there are prominent proofs that people have become more responsible towards the poor community, however, it is not the whole scenario. Sometimes, wealthy people, especially entrepreneurs, establish foundations in a name of charity to reduce the burden of their tax and earn reputations in society. In reality, the intention is not as pure as past generations.
All in all, contemplating all remarks, I firmly believe that helping others is a traditional virtue that people always keep for a long time, but these days, it has become more prominent. This is because technology helps them to reach out to those needy people and because having good earnings allow people to donate money in a poor society.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 927, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'belongings'.
Suggestion: belongings
..., and people would like to donate their personal belongings through them to help a lower community....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ed nowadays, and they earn more than to past time. As a result, having a prosperous and s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple to donate money in a poor society.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, look, so, therefore, whereas, while, talking about, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2686.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 540.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97407407407 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62986696895 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524074074074 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 834.3 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7411348334 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.307692308 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65384615385 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314599819412 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830609247886 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565520652858 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172344829936 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627645091368 0.0645574589148 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.