Usually, in all schools, teachers provide different tasks where students have to work as a team. Later on, all students are graded for their performance on their project work. In this regard, some people think that receiving an equivalent score is the best approach in group projects, while others hold a different opinion that students must need to get their score separately for their projects. From my perspective, the latter view carries more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that considering one grade for all students undermine their educational ability, and students might have to pay a huge cost due to this method. Needless to say, working with the same level students would help to maintain a stimulating environment among all. To elaborate this more, if the grades are given equivalently to all students, then the one who has no incentive to work on a project might get a higher grade since having a high achiever as a teammate. Accordingly, the students who work really hard for a project might get discouraged as they will not be rewarded separately for their achievements and hard work. Consequently, the high achiever may not put in an effort due to having a fear of not getting appreciation from their teachers. Hence, gradually and slowly, it could badly affect their academic performance level.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is that looking at this scenario from another side when students are graded individually on performing for a group task, it is more likely that they would start participating more enthusiastically and efficiently. Additionally, they will try to put propose their ideas and opinions, whereby the outcome of the whole project would be great, and on top of that, it gives an opportunity to other students to grasp a wide horizon of knowledge from them. On the contrary, the students who are not graded separately may feel lazy, and not motivated enough to perform a task. Take my own personal experience as an example of this. When I was a sophomore at university, we supposed to construct a model of human anatomy in biology class. Students were divided into small groups. It is a fact that every student devoted a lot of their time behind this task in order to make it remarkable from others, from which, students can gain extra credits. I personally would have learned many theoretical strategies and real practical experience after participating in that group project.
All in all, contemplating all remarks, I strongly believe that students need to be graded separately in order to enhance their educational performance. This is because it helps them to maintain their enthusiasm and motivation.
- TPO 54 LECTUREThe Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake s water what scientists call its salinity has been increasing steadily for years because the lake s water is evaporating faster than it is being 90
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to take risks and explore new things when you are older than when you are young 44
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has mostly positive effect on lifes in nowadays world 73
- tpo 66 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er participating in that group project. All in all, contemplating all remarks, I...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, first, hence, if, look, may, really, so, then, thus, while, on the contrary, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2296.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0350877193 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85849185495 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537280701754 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7691303016 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211682233122 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063076410123 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538609633643 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13306388152 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025873085276 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.