Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today’s world.
Although some accede with the belief that internet has imposed significantly adverse impact on the life of the current world, I personally argue that the internet certainly influenced our lives in a far better way. I will substantiate my position in the subsequent paragraphs.
The foremost reason why I am in support with the argument is: internet affords to attain the balance in day-day works of the individuals. Having urge to earn good sum of money (to lead the better life), people are investing their efforts and dedication making their daily schedule too hectic, ultimately creating the imbalance in the office and household duties. Thankfully, various facilities provided by an internet assists them to maintain this imbalance. For instance, when I was young, being from the mediocre family, my both parents: mother and father, were too busy in their works; they generally tend to have a packed schedule. Therefore, in order to complete some works -- such as electricity bill payments, bank transfer, shopping works, they would do it within few minutes with the internet banking systems easily. Had such facilities were not available, they would have to travel to different places which would further worsen their imbalance.
Another subtle reason that strengthens my argument is that internet has clearly helped researchers to get information adequately which has enabled them to be highly productive. As we know, research (in any field) plays an important role in the development of the individual, More the number of researches in a year, more will be impact of it consequently. The evident example can be seen in the modern day researcher as compared to researchers in 90's. Not only modern researchers can acquired the information only they need, but also disseminate the information to wide range of researchers. Consequently, an intensive discussion between the researchers worldwide surely enhance the efficacy of research ensuing the positive impact on the country. Thus, the internet has played a significant role in developing individuals in productive time.
Internet platform to connect the people with their loves ones is the final reason that will substantiate my argument. In the present scenario, peoples are deprived of their loved ones, be it for education, or professional duties, or other various reasons. They may not have been able to see them and share their emotions if internet have not arrived. I am also especially thankful for it. Having a dream to attain education in the high ranked universities, I just completed my undergraduate degree being far from my family members-- mother, father, and brother--for four years. Yet, I was able to connect them via different messenger platforms connected by the internet. I, generally, used to share my all day activities, my future plans, and my time during the process. All gratitude to internet for all these memories.
Taking into account of all the above considerations, I affirm that internet has made lives of people very easy either by balancing the day-day works, assisting researchers, and connecting with your loved ones.
- Endothermic Dinosaurs 73
- Communal Online and Traditional Printed Encyclopedia 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend money on salaries university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Problems in Protecting Wild Tauna 52
- Authenticity of Coins 90
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Internet) must be used with a third-person verb: 'platforms'.
Suggestion: platforms
...iduals in productive time. Internet platform to connect the people with their loves ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2621.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27364185111 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91803826904 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 819.0 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3341380342 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.956521739 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6086956522 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5652173913 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108896841738 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328779757543 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333217333746 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716737671563 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429606429878 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Internet) must be used with a third-person verb: 'platforms'.
Suggestion: platforms
...iduals in productive time. Internet platform to connect the people with their loves ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2621.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27364185111 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91803826904 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 819.0 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3341380342 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.956521739 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6086956522 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5652173913 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108896841738 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328779757543 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333217333746 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716737671563 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429606429878 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.