Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People are happier when they give away extra money to charity or a good cause rather than when they spend it on themselves.
I believe that people would be happy if they donated their money to charity. People begin to focus on their spiritual happiness, which comprises of self-identification and social identity, once their basic requirements have been met. I will defend my position from these two perspectives.
First, charitable giving provides a sense of success. Donating money can generate enjoyment through assisting others. Your ability to not only meet your own needs but also improve the lives of others demonstrates that you are incredibly capable. When I was in junior high, my classmates and I staged a modest charity sale and gave the proceeds to underprivileged children. Then, we got correspondence from the youngsters who had been assisted. In the letter, they expressed their gratitude and informed us that they were able to purchase extra food and books thanks to our donation. That day, my buddies and I were ecstatic and delighted to have assisted others with our power. It is evident that donating money to charity may make the individuals being assisted feel joyful, which in turn makes the donor feel proud and content. Certainly, spending money on oneself may be enjoyable. Spending money on something you love or on an activity you enjoy is guaranteed to make you happy. However, the pleasure is fleeting and simple to get. Helping others, on the other hand, gives you a long-lasting sense of success that boosts your confidence and contentment.
In addition, the society lauds those who are prepared to offer to charity, therefore individuals might acquire social prestige via this action. The disposition to spend money to assist others Rather of gratifying your own demands, you demonstrate that you are not a self-centered individual. Those who are viewed as kind, just, and sympathetic are more likely to make a favorable impression on others. For instance, many celebrities and businesspeople contribute money in order to obtain a favorable reputation, so enhancing their public image and maximizing their social effect. For the normal person, the act of giving will garner accolades from coworkers and friends. People consequently see you to be a nice and honorable individual. From this perspective, charitable contributions may also make individuals happy. The delight of being acknowledged and respected cannot be purchased with cash. This type of satisfaction is more significant than purchasing material goods.
Spending more money on charity is therefore more conducive to happiness, in my opinion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 76 | view |
| 2022-10-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 76 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | kk890528 | 77 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | cocoza@gmail.com | 76 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | cocoza@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Celebrities such as actors musicians and athletes etc sometimes express their political views in public Some people appreciate knowing the political views of celebrities others think it is not appropriate or useful to know the political views of celebriti 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays it is easier to maintain good health than it was in the past 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People are happier when they give away extra money to charity or a good cause rather than when they spend it on themselves 76
- Celebrities such as actors musicians and athletes etc sometimes express their political views in public Some people appreciate knowing the political views of celebrities others think it is not appropriate or useful to know the political views of celebriti 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays it is easier to maintain good health than it was in the past 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...cus on their spiritual happiness, which comprises of self-identification and social identity...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30827067669 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02234441083 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6388646112 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.72 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.96 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197702224087 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485019354892 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447439731042 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11141594117 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420530473975 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.