Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People holding different view
cannot achieve success as a team.
In today's convoluted and competitive world, it becomes a highly charged and hot debatable topic whether people are able to achieve success by holding a various view or not. Therefore, some people are the leading proponent of the claim that people would not be successful if they have a variety of view when they are in a team. However, others may take an opposite point of view and believe that the chance of success will increase if people have various opinions when working as a team. If I have to face these two choices, I tend to choose the latter idea. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most irrefutable reasons.
To begin with, group productive will be boosted by having various views resulting in finding all bugs and weakness in order to get success. To elaborate on, by holding various ideas, all positive and negative aspect of each decision will be investigated by bombarding each of them. Hence, by criticism of any ideas, the chance of making mistakes are mitigated or even eliminated. In contrast, if all members have the same ideas, they are limited to a low range of decisions, which are really vulnerable. By doing so, if they choose something wrong, owing to an absence of comparison, they cannot their view is true or not. As a result, in order to increase the performance and achieve success, considering a topic by various view will guarantee the prosperity of a group.
Apart from increasing efficiency, the second debatable point is that having a various idea may give rise to conflict among people by standing on their own idea. However, others believe that this a miniature model of whole society and people are able to learn how to behave with people who have a various idea. I take the former viewpoint with a pinch of salt and claim that the latter viewpoint is much closer to the reality, for I do believe that the more people interact with people having different kinds of idea, the more they will be a success by becoming various kinds of behavior lead them to fortify team cooperation. By way of illustration, according to the survey conducted by the University of Tehran, those groups which their members have various idea towards anything, are able to achieve success because of being skilled to interact in tandem without kinds of problems.
To wrap it up, given the increasing productivity and improving interpersonal skill, one soon realizes the positive importance of having various kinds of idea to group's success inasmuch as in the first place, they can enrich each idea by bombarding it from various point of view and reach the impeccable idea, as in the second place, they are to be taught by learning how to interact with others having various views.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-30 | Mehrdad.imn | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Classmates and partner can communicate with each other face to face to finish the project than by sending e-mail 76
- Some people have ambitious dreams and keep following them, but other people alwaysfocus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better? 73
- Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
- Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, really, second, so, therefore, apart from, in contrast, as a result, to begin with, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81115879828 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59153202562 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467811158798 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.94265232975 303% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.1014152838 48.9658058833 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.125 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 5.45110844103 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166417807843 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619427952408 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555858496397 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110738609149 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568434425371 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.