Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past are more interested in improving their neighborhood (the area where they live) than now.
It is going without saying that in such a sophisticated world where the technology is growing so fast, the relationships among people become fade. A controversial question is often raised regarding this issue that whether nowadays people are more eager in enhancing their neighborhoods than the past or not. Some people believe that the relationship between neighborhoods are more than the past because the number of neighborhoods is more than the past and people can spend their nights time with them. However, I strongly believe that not only relationships between neighborhoods become less comparison the past but also the relationship among families become fade. I support my viewpoint with three reasons.
First of all, nowadays individuals spend their time with their job and on the traffic, so when they back home at night, they prefer to spend their time resting and preparing for the next day. Then, they do not endeavor to improve their relationships with their neighborhoods. Nevertheless, in the past, people had more free time and the majority of women's job was the housewife and they have much time to improve their relationships. For example, in the past, some individuals cooked more food and give part of their foods to neighborhoods or the neighbors were the first invitation for their ceremony. But, nowadays people are not aware of situations of other neighbors and even it is possible that they do not know some of them. Therefore, in the past relationships were so far deep opposite now.
Furthermore, nowadays the style of lives have changed and people are living in tall buildings; there is not any open space in order to be used by children of building for playing. however, in the past whole children of the alley form a team for playing football and spend their evening time with each other and they were the link between their parents and make them intimate with each other. For instance, children became friend with participating in the games and then, invited each other to their home and in this way, parents to ensure the relationship of their children, become more familiar with their neighbors. Hence, in the past people were trying to improve their relationships with their families and their neighbors.
Last but not least, by developing the technology, people become more competitive to enhance their incomes and their level of their lives inverse the past. So they become more selfish and they become carelessness about their neighbors. But, in the past neighborhoods were closer with their families and they were concern about the drawbacks of their neighbors. For instance, I remember that one of the neighbors of my grandfather failed in his job and my grandfather helped him to start the new job and supported him.
To sum up, all of the aforementioned reasons lead us to the fact that the condition of the past let individuals be more careful about their neighbors and share their time more than now.
- Do you agree or disagree with the parents should let children make mistake and let them learn from their own mistakes 53
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers' performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past are more interested in improving their neighborhood (the area where they live) than now. 73
- When making major purchase for example car or laptop our decisions can be influenced by different sources of information Explain how each of the following sources of information can influence your decision 1 Recommendations from friends or colleagues 2 In 42
- Some people say that teachers and parents should decide what assignment or activities children should do after school Others say that children should make these decisions on their own Which view do you agree with and why 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is going without saying that in such ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...port my viewpoint with three reasons. First of all, nowadays individuals spend...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nships were so far deep opposite now. Furthermore, nowadays the style of lives...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ed by children of building for playing. however, in the past whole children of the alle...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...in the past whole children of the alley form a team for playing football and spend t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h their families and their neighbors. Last but not least, by developing the te...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... start the new job and supported him. To sum up, all of the aforementioned rea...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... and supported him. To sum up, all of the aforementioned reasons lead us to the f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2457.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00407331976 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78120205819 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429735234216 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1601495014 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.85 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.55 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370081931636 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140399266691 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768396750162 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232687619623 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353825730195 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.