Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past were more interested in improving their neighborhood (the area where they live) than now (after some edits)
Environmental activists believe that if people want to tackle environmental problems such as air pollution and climate change, people need to pay attention to the region they are currently living. This trend prompts a controversial issue whether our ancestors were more interest in their area they lived or we do. I firmly believe that if our neighborhood were in a dilemma where to choose us or people lived one century ago, it would definitely choose our ancestors.
First and foremost, in these days people have a burden of various responsibility on their shoulder. Since the world has become more and more competitive, people do not have enough time to devote it to development of their home. Even when they reach home, they are obliged to increase their knowledge to survive in this world. Accordingly, the tendency of having a better neighborhood decreases significantly.
Secondly, the industrialization of the economy plays a major role in diverting the attention of people toward environmental problems. In the past, Since the most of the professions were related to agriculture, people provided their basic necessities for their family by working on the land near their home. Accordingly, by activities like lands reclamation, they tended to lift up the quality of living. With the growth of metropolitan cities, However, the economic situation has changed and people don’t need to consider their environment to increase their welfare. As a result, they have less interested in the environment they are living
Last but not least, in these days, people believe that it is government's task to ameliorate their region. Due to the fact that a great part of the revenue of the government is associated with the taxes they pay to the state, they subscribe to the belief that it does not their responsibility to concern about the place they are currently living. However, the states didn’t play an important role in the past and it was habitats' task to improve their environment.
In a nutshell, I adamantly believe that previous generations had a huge vested interested in their environment. I feel this way because of changing the economic situation and also they have more free time to devote it to have a more proper neighborhood.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- tpo 9 3
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.To what extent do you agree or disagree 50
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement: The rules that the whole societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 78
- Do you agree or disagree? It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...professions were related to agriculture, people provided their basic necessities ...
^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... to agriculture, people provided their basic necessities for their family by working on the land...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tats task to improve their environment. In a nutshell, I adamantly believe that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, i feel, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13315217391 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02942090324 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524456521739 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3415177969 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0625 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306353358497 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100600695201 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542831797315 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171750226871 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386044671527 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.