One of the most decisive factors for a group's success is the interaction and relation between its members. I am of the belief that should someone not have the ability to accept the criticism, he cannot be a successful person in team working. In the following, two convicting reasons are put forth to clarify my personal perspective.
The first illustration which can demonstrate my personal opinion is the fact that a successful team-work needs friendship between its members. Broadly speaking, people should work with enthusiasm and diligence if they want to reach their goals; not until a strengthened connection between members exists, could success be possible. However, conflict among members can reduce the group's productivities and outcomes. It is obvious that if someone does not accept the criticism, he could produce conflict between members. All of the members try to prove their claim, so their concentration on their project will be decreased. In contrast, if the person accepts the criticism at the first, he can avoid unusable arguments in the group, so he can increase the chance of the group's success to reach its goal. The success of the group means the success of all its members.
Also, it cannot go unnoticed that the conflict caused by criticism among members is time-consuming. To elucidate more, They have to spend a vast majority of their precious time debating with each other, Therefore, they will lose the time which they could use to conduct their project. To give a good example, consider a case in which a person who is criticized by one of his colleagues; if he is not open to criticism, he will start to support himself, then other members join their discussion, and this debate might last for hours. Hence, this wasted time can show its effect on the group's results; they cannot finish their work on time. Ultimately, this can cause the group's failure.
In the light of above-mentioned reasons, I am a proponent of the idea that people should be able to accept the criticism if they want to be successful in a group. I feel this way because not only does it prevent the conflict among members, but also it can help members to not waste their valuable time on unusable debates. It is why that it is strongly recommended that people should be open to criticism in the group.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific reasons and examples to support you 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who cannot accept criticism from others cannot be successful at working in a group. Use reasons and examples to explain your choice. 60
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 83
- People can solve important problems by themselves or by their families; thus, it is almost not necessary to refer to the government. 61
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
One of the most decisive factors for a g...
^^^^
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
... One of the most decisive factors for a groups success is the interaction and relation...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to clarify my personal perspective. The first illustration which can demonst...
^^^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...t illustration which can demonstrate my personal opinion is the fact that a successful team-work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...could produce conflict between members. All of the members try to prove their claim, so th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 774, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...p, so he can increase the chance of the groups success to reach its goal. The success ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eans the success of all its members. Also, it cannot go unnoticed that the co...
^^^^
Line 5, column 675, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...on time. Ultimately, this can cause the groups failure. In the light of above...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly, this can cause the groups failure. In the light of above-mentioned reas...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, broadly speaking, i feel, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88324873096 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73669506125 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47461928934 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8118682868 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213816345486 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766336713719 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049669184309 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140972913397 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137341907327 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.