Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have had difficulty learning a skill go on to become better teachers of that skill than people who learned that skill easily. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
All people are different, so everyone spends different amount of time and effort to study something. A person, who learned a skill easily and a person, who worked hard usually have similar result, but who will be the best teacher? I definitely think that the person who made more effort will be more effecting in passing his or her knowledge and skills to others. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, people who have had difficulty learning a skill in the end are more competent in this subject. So, if a person learned a skill easily, obviously he or she / they spent less time to explore the subject than someone who worked hard. Therefore, the latter probably is more knowledgeable and more competent than the former. For instance, when I studied for my exam on business statistics, I was preparing with my friend. The subject was very complicated and it was difficult for me, but my friend had noissues with the subject. So, while I was studying, I was very attentive and thorough, moreover I paid attention to all details. In contrast, my friend refered took the subject cursory. He did not spend much time because he was very successful in his other classes . As a result, I had become more competent in the subject than my friend and I got a better grade on the exam.
Secondly, people who have experienced difficulty learning a skill are more patient and tolerant. The main point is that such people know that someone may have issues with the subject, because they were in the same situation in the past / in the same shoes, so they will be more patient. Moreover, people who worked hardl to develop the skill, probably know how they can teach more efficiently a person who has similar issues with subject as they had, so maybe they have some tips and tricks for a man for whom learning is not so easy.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that people who spend a lot of time to develop a skill are more competent as teachers than people who learned the skill easily.
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world 70
- Your city has received a large donation of money to improve the education of children Would you spend the money on the improvement of early childhood education ages 4 to 7 or on the improvement of education for older children ages 11 14 Use specific reaso 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who have had difficulty learning a skill go on to become better teachers of that skill than people who learned that skill easily Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...person, who learned a skill easily and a person, who worked hard usually have sim...
^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est teacher? I definitely think that the person who made more effort will be more...
^^
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more competent in this subject. So, if a person learned a skill easily, obviously...
^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... someone who worked hard. Therefore, the latter probably is more knowledgeable an...
^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is more knowledgeable and more competent than the former. For instance, when I s...
^^
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owledgeable and more competent than the former. For instance, when I studied for...
^^
Line 2, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...friend. The subject was very complicated and it was difficult for me, but my frie...
^^
Line 2, column 761, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...much time because he was very successful in his other classes . As a result, I h...
^^
Line 2, column 783, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...as very successful in his other classes . As a result, I had become more compete...
^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on the exam. Secondly, people who have experienced difficulty learning a skill ...
^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ow how they can teach more efficiently a person who has similar issues with subje...
^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople who spend a lot of time to develop a skill are more competent as teachers t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60055096419 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48870961248 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479338842975 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7114547611 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2352941176 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323775989763 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1250262986 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132867937793 0.0737576698707 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252659898488 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782431273058 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.