Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
It is axiomatic that in this progressive and sophisticated world where we live, human beings have been accustomed to gain a lot of information from every corner of the world. In this regard, technologies play a significant role to convey information to people. While many individuals hold the opinion that governments have to provide infrastructure and free access to the internet for citizens, on the other hand, many people believe that it is not a necessary action for countries. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the former opinion and my reasons to substantiate my point of view are presented in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, due to the advance of technology in recent decades, the internet becomes the most critical part of every society. To be more specific, devices based on the internet are inevitable sectors of humankind. Consequently, governments should spend a huge amount of their budget to make it easier for people to connect to the world wide web. Since the costs of living in contemporary times raise into the sky, countries can devote money to technology which is really essential for society. If the government does not help people to stay connected to the internet, people will lose this opportunity to gain valuable information and knowledge, which is really embarrassing in 21 century.
Furthermore, it is crystal clear that many jobs lie on the internet in modern periods. Online taxies, doing household works, daily services, restaurants are examples few but not least. As a result, the majority of people's career requires to be online 24 hours. So as governments have to allocate money to the communication sector; especially, the internet and online services. An example can drive this notion home. A few years ago, in my county, the government decided to reduce unemployment in the country, so they took advantage of researchers and experts to investigate the reasons why online occupations were unsuccessful. Ultimately, these experts suggested to the government to provide the internet freely in order to encourage them to use online services. As a result, after a few years, unemployment went down and the economy flourished.
To warp it up, having the aforementioned reasons and points into account, I do believe that countries have to devote money to provide the internet for free because people can gain information through it easily and also many jobs depend on the internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 80
- In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at a young age 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only 73
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to gaining'.
Suggestion: accustomed to gaining
...d where we live, human beings have been accustomed to gain a lot of information from every corner ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...dge, which is really embarrassing in 21 century. Furthermore, it is crystal clear that...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, really, so, while, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10804020101 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.999815866 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547738693467 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.370604589 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.944444444 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18457588314 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524261522305 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430574743964 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107889439721 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0062726479251 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.