By and large, in today's complex world we live in, where are full of challenges and problems for people, it comes as no surprise that governments decide to establish lots of rules for people to be followed. There always is a heated contention among people whether these rules are too strict for the youngsters to obey or not. While some people strongly believe that these are really severe for young people to obey, some others have the opposite opinion. I am of the latter group and I strongly do believe that these rules must be followed by all people in general and youngsters in particular. The rationale behind this thesis will be elaborated upon and exemplified in the ensuing paragraphs.
One imperative reason which comes to the mind at first is that each society for having an ordered community and disciplined environment must have strict rules for all persons, especially for the young people. One famous German sociologist once mentioned that this world where we live in is as same as a forest which all people are competing for having a better life for themselves. Thus, if we do not obey the rules which government established for the countries, how we can expect a peaceful and disciplined environment for the living?! To illustrate this issue, I can exemplify one rural site, which I went to for a mission for producing a dam. This site was really small and I guess the population that lives in there, was roughly fifty. All the people were familiar with each other and did not want to help others from another site. They were really strange to me which our groups could not handle the project well because of lacking severe rules in there. They were curious about our job and did not allow anyone to do their jobs. In addition, in the time I were there, I saw a lot of aggressive challenges among those people and they utilized knives for arguing with each other and it was a really timid scene for me and my colleagues.
Another important issue which should not be overlooked is that most of the young people do not have enough maturity and experiences as well. They rarely can distinguish between some dangerous things and beneficial issues for their lives. Owing to this fact, if they were not surrounded by rules, they would do things which are detrimental to all the people in general and themselves in particular. Imagine the rule of not driving for the people under the age of 18. If they did not obey this rule, they not only might hurt themselves, but also other people are not at a safe point.
All in all, according to aforementioned reasons and examples, I strongly disagree with this statement and I highly suggest that all people should follow the rules of having a better life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is always
... rules for people to be followed. There always is a heated contention among people whethe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, really, so, thus, well, while, i guess, in addition, in general, in particular, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2241.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69811320755 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51743652354 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48427672956 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8523366874 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.947368421 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1052631579 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182736178151 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064590786515 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504899847364 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136719462295 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417993422273 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.