Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To solve present and future problems, it is necessary to understand the past.
In the modern era, technology play a prominent role in individuals’ lives. No century witnessed more progress in technology rather that 20th century did. By this way, people encounter more problems day after day that they have not experienced for many years. A controversial question which arises here is whether we should review the past for finding our solutions or we can make a better decision in depend on our situation. As far as I am concerned, to solve present and future problems, it is not necessary to understand the past. In the following paragraphs, my viewpoint will be elucidated through two remarkable reasons.
The first remarkable point to be mentioned is that the world is changing, so problems are changing. Our needs are altered, as an example these days we suffer from air pollution and traffic congestion while we cannot compare these problems with the past. Moreover, if we want to solve our issues, we should consider which is it profitable
for future or not. If we concentrate to the past, not only cannot solve our problems, but also it is time consuming.
Moreover, mental health and physical health are significant issues these days, while definitely we didn’t have these problems in the past. One of the important reasons was about people who contacted friendly and enjoyed their lives without be anxious about vague future.
The second pivotal reason that is worth being taken is that some solutions were just effective in the past or we don’t have the necessary
equipment to do them. For instance, building apartments or shopping centers weren’t a significant issue in the past.
Although many rudimentary concepts are the same, but engineers need a major breakthrough in the designing of buildings. Therefore, some of solutions in the past were primitive so that it isn’t useful for developed societies. In consequence, an elaborate plan about future and decide wisely, is vital for us.
Finally, it is an indisputable fact that in the arduous journey of life, every thing will be changed admittedly. But we can learn from the past and know that life has
upsides and downsides. Some mistakes can be repairable and others might be irreparable. We can exploit our ancestor’s experiences to create happy society nonetheless the problems which need sophisticated solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-06 | false_shakespeare | 83 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | neda.rrr | 95 | view |
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Printed books have had greater effects on society than televisions. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To solve present and future problems it is necessary to understand the past 95
- At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity- for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to 70
- At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity- for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'problems'' or 'problem's'?
Suggestion: problems'; problem's
...did. By this way, people encounter more problems day after day that they have not experi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e should consider which is it profitable for future or not. If we concentrate to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...d consider which is it profitable for future or not. If we concentrate to the...
^^^
Line 8, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...past or we don't have the necessary equipment to do them. For instance, buil...
^^^
Line 10, column 71, Rule ID: MAJOR_BREAKTHROUGH[1]
Message: Use simply 'breakthrough'.
Suggestion: breakthrough
...epts are the same, but engineers need a major breakthrough in the designing of buildings. Therefor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 131, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the solutions') or simply say ''some solutions''.
Suggestion: some of the solutions; some solutions
... the designing of buildings. Therefore, some of solutions in the past were primitive so that it i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arn from the past and know that life has upsides and downsides. Some mistakes can...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Upsides
...rom the past and know that life has upsides and downsides. Some mistakes can be rep...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2110817942 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95806489757 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577836411609 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2363686937 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0476190476 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0476190476 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.53405017921 198% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153680455727 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507009085594 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091683862172 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691684445704 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541433569806 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.