Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more interested in politics than they were in the past.
Without a shadow of a doubt, due to the significant development in science in recent hundreds, humans have changed their understanding of the world in various aspects, such as morality, policy, etc. Thus, some people may believe that students are not as interested in politics as they were in the past, considering the changing lifestyle, but it is not an opinion to which I subscribe. Instead, I believe students develop their inclination in politics nowadays for the following reasons.
First and foremost, advanced technology offers students more chances to obtain political information through social media, which means that they are more likely to develop interests in things that they are more familiar with. While students only receive political news by communicating with classmates or viewing billboards on the street, students today can acquire information through phones and televisions at any time, which motivates them to actively keep eyes on significant events happening at home and worldwide, avoiding acting like a bookworm. For example, my father once shared his student experience, telling me he rarely cared about politics at that time, considering the most important thing for him was to study hard to achieve an excellent college to find a high-payed job to raise the family. Besides, there were few methods offered to let him know what political events were happening. However, I, a contemporary student, always view political events such as recent political meetings content or chairman's speech on websites, which recommends news on their front pages.
Furthermore, owing to the transition to quality-oriented education, students have to be followers, focusing on the study and having to be leaders to help their motherland realize some policies. To elaborate further, students build up a club in college to advocate for people to protect the environment, given that the nation has disseminated this idea for many years, hoping our progeny still have a lovely environment to live in. I attended a club as mentioned above in the college. We regularly held activities, such as organizing students to plant trees monthly, showing scientific films presenting how urgently students should help preserve the environment, and calling up volunteers to guide people to do garbage sorting. Haven't I had the experience of being a leader in organizing these activities, I would not have known I can helping implement national policy.
Reflecting upon all the aforementioned grounds, we can conclude that students get themselves involved in the political field more often nowadays, no matter the aspect of viewing news or taking action.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more interested in politics than they were in the past 76
- TPO 45 Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO 49 Integrated writing 80
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice for a client."Most homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last heating season that 61
- TPO44 the silver coin which is founded in US is genuine evidence or the fake one 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1128, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... to those websites recommand news to me everyday at the front pages. Furthermore, socie...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, as for, as to, for example, i think, in contrast, such as, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2249.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11136363636 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8263362597 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.1344086022 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.2586751497 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.416666667 100.406767564 187% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.6666666667 20.6045352989 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 5.45110844103 231% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263595751832 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976147493443 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631526983175 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14464178392 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465989776575 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 11.7677419355 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 58.1214874552 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.1575268817 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.0537634409 163% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.