Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Subjects such as art, music, and drama should be a part of every child's basic education.
It is reported that over a few decades, the proportion of students receiving arts education has shrunk drastically. However, the government should retrieve subjects like art, music, and drama because they are pieces of every child’s basement of development. I totally advocate this idea due to some rational reasons.
To begin with, arts education ameliorates children’s academic performance now that it provides a great number of essential skills. Science has proved that visual arts students can learn to enhance their spatial learning, organizational skills, visual memorization, and emotional development. Moreover, when learners ascertain the history of art through the study of other artists, they are able to reach the level of reading comprehension. For example, my sister is into painting and she admires Leonardo de Vinci, so she reads every document about Leonardo in both English and Vietnamese. Therefore, her lexical has been greatly enriched, and she can translate English articles into Vietnamese ones fluently.
Secondly, creativity is the most detectable signal at a child who fancies arts education. Unlike mathematics and science which already have laws and rules, arts subjects encourage students to comfortably manifest their viewpoints. For example, students can give hundreds of different pictures if they are required to describe their beloved country. What’s more, it does not have to be arts educations that allow students to show their creativity, a child who loves art tends to find different ways to solve a math problem by its own rather than following typical steps that were taught by teacher. As a result, children who practice arts everyday are prone to find solution easier when they meet troubles.
Finally, mature thinking and profound sympathy are benefits that arts programs could support. There are many evidences that fans of art have higher EQ than normal people now that they have natural humor or come up with touch statements that no one could think of. Furthermore, students who love music have tendency to “feel the lyrics”; they do not just listen to the beat, they notice the lyrics and try to feel the artists’ emotions. This can help them easily sympathize with people who are in need.
In short, arts education gives children indisputable advantages namely upgrading academic achievement, creativity, and mature soul.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-24 | meet96301 | 90 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | vrushali2812 | 66 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | huy04 | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Naomi_manager | 90 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Naomi_manager | 90 | view |
- Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world Do you agree or disagree 76
- An American film actor once said Tomorrow is important and precious Some people think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future than to the present Do you agree or disagree 83
- Do you agree or disagree that the most important thing that the government can do in improving health care is to clean the environment 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work in a larger company than a small one 88
- In many countries the most common solution for criminal behaviour is prison but many believe that a better education is more effective To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...As a result, children who practice arts everyday are prone to find solution easier when ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hievement, creativity, and mature soul.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in short, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42204301075 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77803950091 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647849462366 0.524837075471 123% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0971125612 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.055555556 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209807896041 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598261815848 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584520214368 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113336860901 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523983921083 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.