Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Successful people try new things and take risks rather than doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Doing challenge experience and unpredictable works activities for every people aren't available. So people who can imagine doing this type of works and doing this type of activity distinguish people into two types of ordinary and successful people. In this regard, some people are of the opinion that people should be doing new and risky activities and achieving new skills and opportunities. Personally, I agree with this statement due to various reasons, two of which I'm going to elaborate upon to substantiate my viewpoint in the following essay.
First and foremost, people learning to do works incautious way and preventing from risk. This behavior learns by people in schools or Conservative families, because of this most people only doing activities they are doing well and preventing from doing new and more risky works. People can never discover their characteristics by doing this Conservative problem-solving model. Actually, by analyzing the biography of successful people in history Can be understood, successful people's lifestyles are different from normal people's. For instance, Elon Musk is one of the successful people in the temporary era. Elon Musk is one of the people who do new and challengeable activities that other people can do them. Elon Musk may be a failure most of the time in his works, but his failure is an experience never achieved by other people and can be These defeats can lead to his victory.
Secondly, I believe that It is having a different and searching spirit that makes people successful. Many people thinking and doing the same, also they always use the same solutions for problems. While successful people always trying to do works differently or searching for new solving to problems. A different look from a new perspective makes people successful. This new way to solving works can be to make easier life for people and made successful people rich. Because people always want to do works easily and pay money for learning or using that new way or idea
In conclusion, having considered the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that Successful people try new things and take risks rather than doing what they know how to do well. This is because not only can it talent flourishing people, but also it can be finding new ways to doing works that can solve other people problem in easier and made successful people rich.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different views than people by similar views 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Question In many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...table works activities for every people arent available. So people who can imagine do...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 470, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...nt due to various reasons, two of which Im going to elaborate upon to substantiate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05597964377 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80300890088 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455470737913 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6580220285 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.388888889 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357038991131 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140725522285 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100382495958 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261905256337 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706804857237 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.