passing through the former education conditions to the new circumstances, an updating changes in education grow and appear among the human. In fact, the teaching method has changed which is a kind of effect on a teacher’s position and their appreciating levels. As far as I am concerned, the valuably of teachers have been decreasing from the former to new days. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, limited things have always had higher valuably. Considering the former education environment time, when the number of educated and the number of a qualified person for teaching was not a lot. Moreover, the number of requests for learning and studying among the family has been increased over the course of that time. In other words, the less the number of teachers existed the more valuable they had. One of my own examples is a good case in point. My family lived in a small city and they work as a teacher in a renown high school. Although they were not earning much money and were not enough renowned among people in that tiny city, they were more honored by other parents because they were the member of the small team of teaching people who had been taught for a long time. These circumstances clearly illustrate the relevance between demand and existence of ability which is really valuable.
Second, Regarding the development of technology and the positive effect of them on teaching methods which is known as another reason for less evaluability of teachers. By the invention of the e-book and colossal amount of educational application which are applicable and uses among the children, the needed of teachers have been markedly decreased. The results of one research represent that by increasing the use of these kinds of electronic education systems the need for teachers had been noticeably decreased, which is quite disappointed for older teachers.
In conclusion, I firmly agree that the teachers are not more appreciable than before, it is not only because of the increasing number of teachers but also for inventing new methods of teaching, by using e-book instead of face to face learning.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. Use specific reasons and examples to support you answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Passing
passing through the former education conditions...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, really, regarding, second, so, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9397260274 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69933236118 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531506849315 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5262547117 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6875 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162211201209 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473194141528 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643844894531 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978076184086 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564153051257 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.