Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
In this modern era, we are observing some crucial changes between our lives and our ancestors. One of the most common changes is the role of the teachers in the society. Some people believe that teachers are currently less appreciated and valued than the past; however, some people have the opposite idea. Personally speaking, I firmly believe with the former viewpoint for some reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, in last, teachers were the only parts of the society who had advanced knowledge, and people always used them to fill their information voids. But, nowadays, people (especially young students) can learn their lessons in different ways, particularly with the advantage of the Internet. In this regard, teachers currently have not a unique role in the community. For instance, two years ago, when I was a freshman student in university, I had a problem with one of Newton’s laws in my physics class, and to solve this problem, I explored the Internet and watched a related video in the popular website, YouTube. In the video, a senior student clarified this relatively hard topic in the easiest way, and after that, I have always been master in physics class based on my high grades that I got. This can be inferred that I solved the problem without the help of my teachers. For the reason that I mentioned earlier, I totally believe that teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past.
Another equally important reason is that, in last, teachers’ income was relatively above average in the society, but, currently, governments do not financially support them like what they did in the past. This lack of support from the government and society shows that the value of the teachers has decreased day after day. My own experience is convincing evidence of this. My grandfather and my father were both teachers from two different generations. Whenever I look at their personal lives, I see vast differences, especially in the quality caused by economic effects. My grandfather’s revenue was relatively good, and he always used to go abroad on vacations and saved a considerable amount of money each year. In contrast, my father barely pays his bills despite that he is a more professional teacher than his father. This enormous difference shows that the teachers’ role in the community does not count like what was did in the past.
In conclusion, I believe that teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past. Not only did they the only role in the community who had academic and advanced knowledge, but they were also more financially supported by the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-26 | fvtfff | 94 | view |
| 2020-07-19 | kangyan | 93 | view |
| 2020-06-23 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-23 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | HSNDEK | 70 | view |
- TPO 36 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 96
- Neighbors are the people who live near us In your opinion what type of neighbor is the best to have someone who is quiet someone who we are similar to someone who is supportive Use specific details and examples in your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Companies should pay for employees to get a university degree 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 926, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
... community does not count like what was did in the past. In conclusion, I believe ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95964125561 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73020158298 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502242152466 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4467119628 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2380952381 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274907501627 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885507749185 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110868866986 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190879003746 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083995380266 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.