Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers, sometimes, talk about some particular subjects such as their social or political opinions in the class. Some people believe that teachers should not express their views about society or political issues to the students. On the other hand, some others think that teachers should be permitted to talk about everything in the class. I, personally, concur with the former group for some reason that two conspicuous of them will be elaborated upon hereunder.
First of all, people depending on their experience, have different social viewpoints and political attributes. To be more specific, individuals have different characteristics and belief which shape their personalities and behaviors. When they declare their opinion about such issues in the class, they deprive the students of the chance of making an independent idea unconsciously. In this circumstance, the students get familiar with society and its political aspects through the teacher's view and may lose the opportunity of knowing the reality of society. Additionally, students usually like teachers and accept their point of view about anything. So, I believe that students should make their viewpoints independently.
Second, teachers influence the atmosphere of the class and also home profoundly. When a teacher talks about his or her idea about some social or political concepts, students learn those ideas, bring them home, and express for their family. Their family might agree or disagree with the teacher’s idea. Then, it may have some unwanted results such as disputation and discussion at home between family members and also in the class between students. For example, when a teacher is a proponent of a political fraction or a social attribute, some students agree with the teacher and some disagree. In this situation, the classroom splits and students are not comfortable in such air. For instance, when I was a student at school, my teacher told us about her political attribute. I disagreed with her point and declared my view. My friend, despite our amicable relationship, was annoyed by my opinion and it affected our friendship.
By and large, with these two mentioned reasons into account, I vehemently assert that teachers should not talk about their social or political viewpoints in the class because not only do they influence students’ viewpoints, but also they may turn the friendly atmosphere of the class into an uncomfortable one.
- The government wants to fund one of the following areas to improve children s education Which one do you think is better Why hire more teachers to teach in a small class make preschool education before kindergarten mandatory provide some training co 73
- Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics like state Olympics team 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- In 20 years from now on students will not use printed books any more 90
- Which of the following is the most effective way for parents to get children aged 3 6 ready for the start of the school Providing appropriate books for children to learn how to read Reading books aloud for children Improving children s communication skill 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, then, for example, for instance, such as, by and large, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3671875 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87907202382 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4017233183 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.05 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288756005376 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103959141117 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631136081913 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188649549565 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305256962636 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.