Barely no other topics receive more attention than education. With the development of our technology, sources can be accessed in many ways. I certainly agree that teachers can be replaced by some technologies in some degree.
First of all, lots of electronic devices which have artificial intelligence can assist with our homework. For example, if I miss some class or want to know extra knowledge, Wikipedia and YouTube are good choices for me to self-study. Also, facing with the difficult problem, I can use many apps to solve it such as YouTube. During the pandemic, I could not study at school, YouTube offers me an easy way to study at home. Studying online is easier and more convenient to figure out the problem than to ask teachers. However, in the past, the only way that can gain knowledge is from teachers, and the Internet cannot be accessed. Therefore, the importance of teachers may be not as much as before, and studying online will become the mainstream. Not only the development of technology undermines the status of teachers, but also awakening of students\' mind.
Moreover, the authority of teachers decreases because students are taught to focus more on critical thinking and have their own thought. Thus, students may doubt about their teachers. In contrast, in the past, teachers were authoritative, and students thought that whatever their teachers said is true and they should respect teachers. For example, in ancient China, most people in China were Confucianism, and they believed that teachers were an important role in the society. All of people must respect their teachers even the emperor, and teachers had very high social status. Therefore, the influence of past teachers is greater than present teachers.
Some people may argue that teachers cannot be replaced by the internet and devices entirely. However, in present class, every teacher must take responsibility and educate hundreds of students in a grade in China, and they have not got enough effort to pay good attention to every student. However, in the past, one teacher only needed to teach several students, and they could know much about all the students. When the teachers cannot help every student, students may get annoyed to the teachers because they may think that teachers do not care about them. Also, they will have less time to ask questions to teachers, so education apps can fix this gap, and students may start to rely on them. Thus, the influence of the teachers will get less.
All in all, teachers in the past had greater influence than present teachers because of the changes of their social status and the development of technology. Learning without teachers, students can still receive knowledge from lots of ways.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- In what way can high school teachers better improve students study interests a applying more technology in class b explaining the close connection between what they are learning and the world c arranging students to work in group assignments instead of wo 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06637168142 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61529130498 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480088495575 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7982528297 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.08 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165149125315 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519376217271 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398356080382 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100208253665 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031507678251 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.