Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it’s more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
There is no shortage of debate that everyone has their preferred work methods, and all of them have their benefits and people try to do their bests to complete their works or tasks as well as possible. Some people believe that the pace of doing the work is more important, however, others prefer to do their work as accurate as they can. Personally speaking, both of these ideas are true and according to the situation, we can choose one of them.
To begin with, one should take into account the fact that working at high speed, can converse our time and energy so we can spend this extended time and energy to do our other works or finish our current task faster. Of course, there are some who argue that when we work at high speed, we may make many mistakes, however, I believe that we can boost our performance by training and make fewer mistakes. My opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. A few years ago, when I worked in a company as a controller, I had to check some pieces in one station. At first I used to do my duty as accurate as possible so it took a long time to check each piece but I tried to do it faster and by training, I could improve my speed and I not only checked more pieces per a day and saved my time but also I did it with minimum mistakes.
The second remarkable reason is that it’s an inevitable fact that our accuracy decreases when we increase our speed. In some works, precision is more important than speed and we are not allowed to make any mistakes. Although we can raise our precision by training, we never able to eliminate the probability of making mistakes. For instance, doctors have a crucial job in society because they deal with people’s life. They can cause many people to die by their wrong decisions. if a surgeon wants to surgery more people per day, he has to do his surgery faster so his accuracy reduces and it is so hazardous because if he makes any mistake, the patient will die. So in some works accuracy is critical and we should try to raise it up as possible as we can.
In conclusion, it’s important to do our tasks faster because we can save our time and energy but in some works, our mistakes are not compensable and we should do them as accurately as we can so we should choose one of these methods according to our tasks wisely.
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a successful future. 73
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 63
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future the society as a whole. 73
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people are now less happy or less satisfied with their life than people in the past. 60
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that society today expects young people to follow and obey are so strict. 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...people to die by their wrong decisions. if a surgeon wants to surgery more people ...
^^
Line 5, column 685, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'works'' or 'work's'?
Suggestion: works'; work's
...stake, the patient will die. So in some works accuracy is critical and we should try ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, of course, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 43.0788530466 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39359267735 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44771474843 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466819221968 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.7558820816 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3125 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170769193697 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656409080837 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457605313105 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11315125399 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254873787988 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.