Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Along with having more attention to environmental issues, people today are trying to figure out how to decrease the green-gas emissions to the Earth. Some people claim that automobiles are one of the main pollutions to our Earth, thus, other means of transportation should replace most cars. However, I do not see any sign that it will be viable. Therefore, I believe that it is unlikely that there will be fewer cars in twenty years, for the following reasons.
First of all, public transportation cannot reach every corner of the world. The most significant advantage of driving a car is the driver can get to the place that public transportation can hardly reach. For example, there are a lot of natural sightseeing landscapes in Taiwan that are located in very remote locations. If people want to travel there, they would inevitably have a car first. Otherwise, they may have to spend most of their vacation on transportation. Therefore, cars still play an important role in people's life.
Moreover, even though public transportation can reach every place of our world, there would be more challenges that we have to overcome. One of the important challenges is how to maintain the operation of public transportation. We all know maintaining the operation of public transportation requires a considerable amount of money. Hence, a complete transportation network usually appears only in urban areas, since urban areas contain more population than other regions. If we build the same network in the countryside, with insufficient users using it, it will probably finish all the budget for basic operation. And eventually, lead to the shutting down of the service.
Finally, there are more and more automobile production companies investing their resource for alternative energy cars. Because if they can provide alternative solutions for the environmental concern, people would not need to exploit public transportation as their only option to mitigate air pollution. The most renowned example is Tesla, Tesla is one of the most successful automobile manufacturers for green energy cars. And with the success of Tesla, more automobile manufacturers, such as Toyota, VOLVO, are developing their eco-friendly cars. Consequently, an increasing number of people choose to buy green energy cars, instead of taking public transportation.
In conclusion, though public transportation is the most straightforward way to mitigate air pollution, still other issues waiting for us to surmount. And with the appearance of alternative solutions, I do not reckon that there will be fewer cars within twenty years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | theprasad | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | Mangiring Pandapotan | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | daddy | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities Use sp 76
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 83
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias how 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36739659367 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13133487178 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525547445255 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1780440758 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9130434783 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8695652174 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47826086957 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127587650195 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406660183464 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671448196678 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857030172631 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598611360317 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.