Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people believe that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than of today. They think that the increasing awareness among people toward environment would be the main reason for this. However, I strongly disagree with this and assume that there will be more cars in the upcoming years. I will support my viewpoints for two reasons.
First of all, there are many countries where the economy is thriving and they are fast moving toward becoming a developed nation. This means that there will be an upliftment in the per capita income and it directly linked this to more purchase of motor vehicles. For example, in countries like India, more and more automobiles companies are investing because of presence of a large market and each year country is witnessing more record sales of automobiles. In the absence of such a strong economy, public is more reliable on public transportation. Usually a strong economy means a better public transportation system, but it also means that people will ask for more comfort and privacy and because of this, I think that there will be more cars in the upcoming future.
Second of all, new renewable energy, like electric and hydrogen fuel powered engines, will inspire more people to buy automobile and taste the newer experience coming with such cars. Inadequate availability of such car demotivate people from buying old traditional diesel/petrol fueled engine cars. But, many countries are investing large capital on electric and hydrogen fuel, the overall cost of such cars will decrease drastically. For instance, a decade back, buying an electric car was so expensive, but today there are many companies providing affordable electric cars. Tesla is such an example of it. These cars are often quiet, have low running cost, and can reach to a high speed quickly. Thus, there will be more demand for cars in the coming twenty years.
To conclude, the assumption regarding the number of cars on the road in the coming twenty years is highly debatable. Some people suggest governments should make public transport more efficient. Nevertheless, I still contend that there will be more cars in use in the coming twenty years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | theprasad | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | Mangiring Pandapotan | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | daddy | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Changing reading habits of young people 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0138121547 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5967335719 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8292117086 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5263157895 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220879570528 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845903181261 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988438270313 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167999747871 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102730925713 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0138121547 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5967335719 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8292117086 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5263157895 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220879570528 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845903181261 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988438270313 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167999747871 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102730925713 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.