Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should give the same amount of money to their students' sports activities as they give to their university libraries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
I believe allocating money to sports activities and the libraries equally would not be a reasonable way of dividing university resources.
For one, universities are meant to improve academic capabilities of their students. Therefore, although sports affect learning indirectly as an auxiliary factor, they are not as effective as having a library which is dedicated to sudying and has a plethora of reading options. Also, equal spendings on sports and libraries would need to translate to roughly equal time spent by the student on sports and in libraries. Otherwise, the money would be wasted. This could in turn become a problem and cause distractions since sports would occupy a big part of students’ time.
Another reason I think it is not efficient for universities to spend the same amount of money on sports and libraries is that the equipment and locations for doing sports are usually easier to come by than helping books and peaceful well-equipped libraries. Besides, most students who would use the equipment provided by the university probably already do sports on their own time. I also believe that a library with a relaxing atmosphere would help students with their learning process and would in fact expedite it much more than any sports activity ever could.
The last point I would like to make is that while I believe most university resources must be focused on academic expenses, it does not mean that sports should be dismissed as an on-campus activity. Sports are a great way to improve health and as the saying goes, there can be no healthy mind without a healthy body. So, while I believe athletic activities and competitions must not take a big part of the university budget and students’ time, they should be strongly present on any competitive university.
All in all, I think that universities should stick with their main objective of improving their attendants’ academic capabilities and focus most of their resources on this topic but this does not mean sports must be disregarded completely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | hadimz | 71 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | tenseitsai | 70 | view |
- Teachers are not valuable as they were in the past, do you agree or disagree. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should give the same amount of money to their students' sports activities as they give to their university libraries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 71
- Offering employees options 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is sometimes justified not to tell the truth. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 537, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... in fact expedite it much more than any sports activity ever could. The last poin...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y mind without a healthy body. So, while I believe athletic activities and compet...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, so, therefore, well, while, i think, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16467065868 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92425473104 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51497005988 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2782502701 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.692307692 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274406758668 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106183450437 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581519722317 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16800765608 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516786412589 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.