Assignments have always played an important role in students' development. In this regard, some people believe that due to the unprecedented burgeoning of technology in recent decades, doing home works by using e-mail is superior to get in touch with each other to do that. I have enough reasons to counter this point of view. I will enlarge on them in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, when classmates meet in person to do their assignments, they can reach some purposes, while they will lose those opportunities if they do their works by e-mail. To put it in a more vivid picture, when contact in person, they can kill two birds with one stone. In other words, they can solve their problems in a specific field related to their homework during their discussion, also they can learn how they should deal with opposite idea about that subject. As a way of illustration, take an assignment in university courses. When colleagues do it in person, they can come to a decision very soon. In addition, they can bring up new ideas about the assignment since they consider it from different aspects. As a result, they can learn how to cope with distinctive viewpoints during their discussion.
Secondly, it is possible that students do not understand each other's mean, when they get in touch by e-mail which result in long process to finish the assignment. Conversely, they can explain their words as much needed as it is during a discussion. To clarify this point, people may want to emphasize some parts of their opinions, which leads to different levels of their voices. In stark contrast, they cannot accentuate some sections of their ideas when they share it by e-mail which may give rise to misinterpretation. Furthermore, people usually explain a subject how much they believe that is enough in their e-mails. But, it is likely that their classmates do not get the point and needs more explanation. So, this kinds of things make the process of implementation too long. However, discussing concepts in person does not have these problems.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that colleagues should do their home works in person to achieve a better result. Given the fact that, not only it is a multipurpose work, but also classmates can understand each other better. In addition, they can do their assignment as soon as possible.
- TPO 41 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- TPO 53 taxes on cigarettes 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Grandparents cannot give useful advice to their grandchildren because the world of today and the world of 50 years ago are too different 78
- TPO 29 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e point and needs more explanation. So, this kinds of things make the process of imp...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78420096257 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3170396123 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0909090909 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.40909090909 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213655979739 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701445072988 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534806997662 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141481161631 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364230088934 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.