Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Communication is a skill of a paramount importance for bringing people's vantage points around. Many students like to communicate by e-mails to discuss their shared projects, others prefer to meet face to face. For me, I reckon that commnicating in person with our colleagues is more effective than e-mails and in this essay I will discuss my reasons for that opinion.
To begin with, communicating by e-mails may not transfer accurate messages. Sometimes, written words can not express what we exactly mean and this may lead to wrong interpretation of our points of view. On the other hand, communicating in person allow people to see each other's facial expressions and feel their emotions. For example, one student may describe his colleague's words as aggressive and an order to him. While in fact, he did not intend that.
Secondly, meeting in persons prevent students or colleagues who have to work on the same project from wasting their time. For instance, sending an e-mail will take much time than communicating face to face as it includes several steps. Beginning with thinking of suitable words to write, sending the e-mail and waiting for the other partener to do the same steps and respond. On the contrary, if they meet for only two hours per day they will finish the project in a shorter time than if they depend on e-mails.
Lastly, we can not ignore the problems related to internet service. In many cases, the internet's speed is not fast enough to facilitate the process, so the communication process will be disrupted and this will interrupt the students' thoughts. From my own experience, I suffered from the drawbacks of the internet's companies. When I was in the last year of university, we had to deliver our project on time, but because of some technical problems of the internet, we were late and overdue.
In the summary, communication in person is much more significant than e-mails. This is because meeting our friends save our time, prevent misunderstanding and help us to avoid internet's problems.
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 71
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i reckon, in fact, in many cases, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98823529412 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81321646007 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561764705882 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7395956536 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214559845139 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645562889523 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535886615194 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114251376337 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696192635448 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i reckon, in fact, in many cases, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98823529412 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81321646007 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561764705882 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7395956536 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214559845139 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645562889523 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535886615194 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114251376337 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696192635448 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.