Selecting the best method for completing a group project has always been a matter for its members. In this regard, some people believe that classmate should use email to communicate, whereas I have enough reasons to object to that point of view, and I think being in touch face to face is superior to sending email in order to work on a group project. I will illustrate two of my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, group members can discuss their project’s subject better when they communicate face to face. To put it in a more vivid picture, they can describe their points of view for other members if it is needed. It is due to the fact that it is possible some members do not understand the meaning of other members’ standpoint. As a result, members have the opportunity to explain their viewpoints more and more. In addition, the sense of members’ words is not clear when they use emails. In stark contrast, discussing a subject face to face, members can understand other members’ mood. Take my physic project, for example. My friends and I wanted to use email to communicate in order to complete that project. Although I tried to explain a concept to others very simple and gently, they did not find it out; also they did not pay attention since they thought that I was trying to order them. Consequently, we had to discuss it in person to solve that problem and finish our project.
Secondly, using email as a way of communication takes a lot since it is more likely that one member sends an email to others, while others are not online to take his or her massage. To clarify this point, setting a time to be online at the same time is difficult for all members since it is possible that they have distinctive schemes. As a result, following each other emails in order to make a decision about project will be so hard and time-consuming. As a way of illustration, take my own experience. My friends and I had to do a project last year about high-performance concrete, and we had to do it by emails because of Corona viruses. We lost a considerable amount of time since we could not be online simultaneously. Had we finished it on time, we would have gotten a complete grade and I could have been graduated on time. Hence, get in touch face to face is better for completing projects.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that communicating in person is a more beneficial method to finish a project than doing it by sending emails. Given that not only can group members discuss it to make themselves understood, but also they need less time to follow each other’s stand points.
- Governments need to spend money on beautiful things more than on practical things 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 43 Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important ways to improve the people s health is to clean the environment 76
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for example, i think, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60212765957 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7551679906 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470212765957 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2249768605 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0434782609 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4347826087 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206387871175 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689374934179 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049874573656 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138538642149 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028631649655 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.