Without a shadow of doubt, group project is an inevitable part in school or work life. Once talking about the way to communicate about the project, in numerous people’s opinion, they argue that writing an e-mail is a better way to communicate about the project for colleagues or classmates than face-to-face. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that in-person meeting provides far more advantages for group project. I feel this way for two specific reasons which I will thoroughly examine in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, face-to-face communication is necessary for the team because team members can have a better understanding of each other. For example, people can observe other people’s facial expressions and tone of voice when they speak which help to clarify or contradict the messages being said. Without these non-verbal languages, team members will not be able to tell if they are on the same page and, as a result, they cannot reach consensus easily. It is important for team members to get a clear idea of the group because it makes the team run more effectively and efficiently, thus, meeting in person is beneficial for team members.
Secondly, in person meeting is better since it helps the team solve the problems faster. For instance, team members do not have to standby for another person to be available to reply the e-mails and can discuss the issue instantly. With the presence of the time consumed waiting for other members, the team will come to an agreement slower and, at the same time, delay the working process. It is crucial for the group to have an ability to sort out difficulties in a short time because once faced with an emergency, they have to handle the situation immediately. Therefore, face-to-face communication is important for group projects.
To conclude, the problem of whether classmates/colleagues should communicate in person or via e-mail about the project is complex. Nevertheless, I still contend that face-to-face meeting is advantageous for group projects due to its benefits for the team’s clear understanding and rapid communication.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Games are as important for adults as they are for children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Reading book is more worthwhile than exploring the internet Agree or disagree 90
- TOEFL essay Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Games are as important for adults as they are for children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- Some people believe that the world is being harmed by human activities others feel that human activities make the world a better place which view do you agree with Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion 70
- TOEFL essay Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Games are as important for adults as they are for children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, talking about, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19420289855 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02494842261 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2307787093 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.466666667 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288782722399 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108455428272 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068592516722 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202970938041 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910922379009 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.