Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Opinions diverge on whether meeting in person or communicating through e-mail can be a better solution when working on a project. Some fervently advocate that having a discussion through e-mail will be the best solution when doing a project, I am at loggerheads with this idea due to some rational reasons.
Admittedly, students can share their ideas easily when meeting face to face. People can interact with real people and receive feedback at that moment, which is unlikely to exchange information online. Digital development is a good innovation but people are used to doing projects in person so that they can arrange the work or contribute ideas right away. Compared to e-mail, it takes time for students to write and e-mail and need an internet connection as well. Besides that, meeting in person to do a project can eliminate the situation that lazy students will not contribute to a project because other teammates are sitting in front of them so they have to come up with some ideas.
Further and even more prominently, working on a project in person will train teamwork and communication skills. People have to take responsibility to complete tasks with teammates on time so that they will pay attention more to the project when working in person. Compared to online working, they might not take an excuse such as not reading e-mail or power cut. Moreover, when using this method, people need to talk and discuss with each other which means that shy students will have opportunities to train their communication skills by explaining their ideas to teammates.
Last but not least, working on a project in person will help people complete the task early because it is hard to find a free day for all teammates in a group so they have to force themselves to do the work productively in order to finish the assignments on that free day. If not they might take time from other activities such as gym or extra class to finish classwork project assignments. Compared to online working, they might not care and delay the time because students' mind will think they will complete it later but some students might forget which delay the project of the whole group.
All things considered, Working on a project in person is a better option. Students can finish the project early, train their teamwork skills and their responsibility when doing work in a group.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-15 saharmnd 80 view
2023-03-15 saharmnd 78 view
2023-02-26 hamidbrz 83 view
2023-02-18 zaid 83 view
2023-01-26 lolo_7 60 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, moreover, so, well, as to, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88059701493 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62223510155 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455223880597 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4959860907 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310149900671 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125420808999 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623745213429 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204992978511 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215086993475 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.