Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When people spend a lot of time watching sports on television or following their favorite team, does it have a negative effect on their lives?
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that stirring competitions and sports matches have brought about many people, especially adolescents, to spend plenty of their time for favorite teams. The majority of people think that this issue has adverse effects on individuals’ lives. Contrary to popular belief, I possess the conviction that pursuing the games of our popular teams has beneficial effects on our prospective success. In what follows, I will delve into the paramount reasons to substantiate my perspective.
First and foremost, following a favorite team is a highly effective way of flourishing our potential talents. It is crystal clear that anyone requires a prominent person in their life to learn how can improve their abilities to gain success. Professional athletes could be excellent examples of this since they do exercise regularly, fight for first place, do something that appears impossible, and even break the world records. In this way, they indicate that anything is achievable by diligence. On the other hand, Even after a big failure and disappointment, they take the burden of the failure and keep trying to acquire their desired result. As a case in point, although my brother had innate talent in soccer, the fear of lacking prosperity was an obstacle for improvement in his intended field. When he was informed that his popular team had recruited a new player who once was his school teammate, increased his efforts to reach his well-deserved reputation as an outstanding athlete. Had he not follow his favorite team, he would not have been a sophisticated soccer player so far.
The other point worth mentioning is that, in today’s hectic life, people need to free up some time for the liberation of daily stresses and anxieties. Watching matches on television help that individuals have a good time after a busy day in the workplace. By way of illustration, my country has just encountered an economic crisis, which has had a profound impact on everyone’s life. Nevertheless, My immediate family has made a plan with the extended family to be gathered every weekend for exciting games in the champions league in order to have fun with each other away from economic problems. Furthermore, this is such an interesting program that brings pleasant memories for all family members. It goes without saying that in the same roughly short period, we have been able to enhance our performances in everyday activities since the more recreation we have, the more energy we will receive, and consequently, the better accomplishments we will have.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that following our popular team’s matches has invaluable results on individuals’ social lives not only because of unearthing and pursuing our inherent talents but also for the happy time that it brings to reduce daily anxieties.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today are less dependent on their parents than in the past 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people spend a lot of time watching sports on television or following their favorite team does it have a negative effect on their lives 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful leaders should make others part of the decision making process 95
- Are governments doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of food nutrition and healthy eating 93
- Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends Some people believe that this policy is great others believe that this policy will discourage employees 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, well, in conclusion, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2395.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19522776573 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93806717017 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592190889371 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1360442859 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.052631579 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2631578947 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223208215077 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595259805849 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524643773377 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122406716173 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286481823788 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.