Nowadays, the debate on whether students should work in a group or individually when they have projects from the school has become a controversial issue. In my view, I agree with the statement that working in a group while doing school assignments is more effective for youngsters, and I will explain my reasons why I feel this way in the following essay.
First of all, if students work as a team, they would gain more knowledge about the particular topic as they all have different ideas. In other words, two heads are better than one. The students share their information so that they can comprehend more easily on an assignment given by the teacher. I assume that a personal example can shed light on this notion. During my high school year, I had to do a Geography project with my classmates. Each group had 5 members and we had to create a mind map on how an earthquake occurs. At first, I didn't know anything about the earthquake, but with group discussion, I was able to get an understanding of the topic. Thus, doing projects in a group helps students to learn much more productively.
secondly, in today's world, myriad of companies regard teamwork as an imperative or mandatory skill when taking job interviews. A survey conducted by experts in the United States shows that about 85% of corporations around the world take teamwork as a compulsory requirement for job seekers. Moreover, When students participate in group projects, they tend to socialize and give better communication skills which play a vital role in the learning environment and in the future. For instance, in my country, South Korea, majority of schools held lesson activities in a group so that youngsters can have a better outcome in their academic results.
In conclusion, I firmly agree that participation in group works is beneficial to pupils due to the fact that their learning process can be enhanced and greater job opportunities in the near future.
- Eco certification and American wood companies Integrated Reading Section In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standar 81
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both the views and give your opinion 71
- In today s world many people use mobile phones and the internet to communication with others This has resulted in the use of new words and different forms of spelling and grammar Why do you think these change have happened Are they positive or negative de 69
- Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it or is it better to save your money for some time in the future Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...n how an earthquake occurs. At first, I didnt know anything about the earthquake, but...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...ts to learn much more productively. secondly, in todays world, myriad of companies r...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88519637462 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87212203512 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592145015106 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9645239271 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293970701431 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923122749832 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823671602765 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169650444933 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949771862293 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.