Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A glance at people's attitude toward learning process brings to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether it is more effective to learn in a group or alone. Although some people assert that it is easier to learn alone with no distraction from classmates, I, as a graduate business school, believe that group project is what we need to add to curriculum. My opinion is not only based on my experience, but also on my research.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that all students have specific weak and strong points. For example, whereas some pupils are good at mathematics and financial courses, some others have outstanding knowledge in theoretical concepts such as management. When these two groups of students work together to solve a problem, they make different comment because of various perspectives they have. In other words, they complement each other and get better results. Therefore, It is necessary for students to work in a team to do the required projects.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that when we teach something to a person, we memorize it better. A novel study at Harvard University, department of education, shows that people learn more effectively in group, because it activates a specific part of brain, called Amigdala. As a matter of fact, Amigdala enhances learning process through training others. For example, if we want to teach a student how to memorize a plant's name, when he asks us a question, the question sticks to our mind and we make a connection with the question and the name. Thus, if an individual needs to learn earlier, the best method is to participate in group activity.
Nevertheless, sometimes we need a quiet place to understand the course material. There are a lot of noises and distractions when we share our ideas in group. This concern can be eliminated if we capture fundamental principles in a quiet environment and then improve our understandings in a group. definitely we cannot rely only on group learning, but it is essential for a better understanding.
Due to the aforementioned argument explored in the previous statements, I highly recommend my classmates to participate in group activities and universities to require team work project as well. Recent researches support this opinion and show how beneficial it is.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day s work Others prefer to get up later in the day and work until late at night Which one do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...h something to a person, we memorize it better. A novel study at Harvard University, d...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Definitely
... improve our understandings in a group. definitely we cannot rely only on group learning, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, such as, as a matter of fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9797979798 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94964196396 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4129960785 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.789473684 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195527798274 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542748308274 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054133489748 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975853913317 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053781971809 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.